INFR vs. IXC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - INFR tracks the RARE Global Infrastructure Index while IXC tracks the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INFR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.

Performance

INFR vs. IXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INFR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IXC

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 2.57%
• 6M: 21.42%
• YTD: 27.41%
• 1Y: 36.71%
• 3Y*: 16.54%
• 5Y*: 21.32%
• 10Y*: 9.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFR vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.41%	24.00%	-6.23%	5.20%	-0.19%
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF	27.41%	13.98%	1.95%	3.92%	2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between INFR and IXC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022	0.22

INFR vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INFR	IXC
Utilities	68.5%	0.2%
Industrials	27.5%	-
Real Estate	4.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	99.4%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

INFR vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IXC

IXC Risk / Return Rank: 65
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFR vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INFR	IXC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.91	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.50	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.40	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.55	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	INFR	IXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-67.88%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.36%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-64.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-8.30%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-17.45%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INFR	IXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	19.32%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	23.44%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	26.81%	—

INFR vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

INFR vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison

INFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.71%	2.52%	2.36%	3.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF	2.98%	3.68%	4.56%	3.45%	4.76%	3.98%	4.86%	7.00%	3.51%	3.05%	2.86%	3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INFR and IXC in my portfolio?

INFR and IXC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INFR or IXC?

On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INFR or IXC?

IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INFR or IXC?

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 1.71% for INFR.

What is the main difference between INFR and IXC?

INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: ClearBridge and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for INFR and 0.40% for IXC.