INFR vs. IGLS.L
INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) and IGLS.L (iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - INFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the RARE Global Infrastructure Index, while IGLS.L is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INFR returned 5.42%/yr vs 6.74%/yr for IGLS.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INFR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IGLS.L.
Performance
INFR vs. IGLS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
INFR is traded in USD, while IGLS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IGLS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INFR achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than IGLS.L's 0.07% return.
INFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 7.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGLS.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 1.87%
- 3Y*
- 6.74%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- 0.39%
INFR vs. IGLS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 1.41% | 24.00% | -6.23% | 5.20% | -0.19% |
IGLS.L iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 0.07% | 13.20% | 0.94% | 9.69% | -1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFR and IGLS.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022 | 0.45 |
The correlation between INFR and IGLS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFR vs. IGLS.L — Risk / Return Rank
INFR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IGLS.L
INFR vs. IGLS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (IGLS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INFR | IGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.04 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 0.25 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | 0.58 | +3.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INFR vs. IGLS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFR drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, smaller than the maximum IGLS.L drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFR and IGLS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFR | IGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.28% | -38.64% | +19.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.43% | -5.31% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.55% | -9.30% | -9.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -10.18% | +9.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -13.50% | +8.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.28% | -0.24% |
Volatility
INFR vs. IGLS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) is 0.00%, while iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (IGLS.L) has a volatility of 2.12%. This indicates that INFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFR | IGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 2.12% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.73% | 5.46% | -1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.90% | 7.32% | +1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 9.34% | +4.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 9.55% | +4.69% |
INFR vs. IGLS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLS.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFR vs. IGLS.L - Dividend Comparison
INFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGLS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLS.L iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 3.97% | 3.88% | 3.67% | 1.62% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.53% | 0.46% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 0.88% | 0.48% |
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 2.49% | 2.52% | 2.36% | 3.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INFR and IGLS.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGLS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGLS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.
INFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while IGLS.L is European Government Bonds. INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index, while IGLS.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: ClearBridge and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for INFR and 0.07% for IGLS.L.
Find the right allocation for INFR and IGLS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer