INFR.L vs. DDGC.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

INFR.L (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and DDGC.L (Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - INFR.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index, while DDGC.L is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. INFR.L is passively managed, while DDGC.L is actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INFR.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for DDGC.L.

Performance

INFR.L vs. DDGC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) and Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (DDGC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

INFR.L is traded in GBp, while DDGC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DDGC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INFR.L achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than DDGC.L's 10.91% return.

INFR.L

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: 9.52%
• 6M: 8.44%
• 1Y: 16.29%
• 3Y*: 9.33%
• 5Y*: 7.61%
• 10Y*: 8.66%

DDGC.L

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 4.43%
• YTD: 10.91%
• 6M: 10.40%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFR.L vs. DDGC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	9.52%	-2.48%
DDGC.L Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc	10.91%	0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between INFR.L and DDGC.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

INFR.L vs. DDGC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFR.L

INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 49
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 42
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFR.L vs. DDGC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) and Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (DDGC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INFR.L	DDGC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.96	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INFR.L	DDGC.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	1.98	-1.47

Drawdowns

INFR.L vs. DDGC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFR.L drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, which is greater than DDGC.L's maximum drawdown of -6.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFR.L and DDGC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFR.L	DDGC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.25%	-6.20%	-28.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.70%	0.00%	-3.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.12%	-1.34%	-4.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INFR.L	DDGC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.92%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.49%	11.30%	-0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.26%	11.30%	+0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.10%	11.30%	+2.80%

INFR.L vs. DDGC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFR.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DDGC.L's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

INFR.L vs. DDGC.L - Dividend Comparison

INFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, while DDGC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DDGC.L Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	2.82%	2.97%	2.96%	3.02%	2.54%	2.60%	2.84%	2.70%	2.99%	3.51%	3.45%	4.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INFR.L and DDGC.L in my portfolio?

INFR.L and DDGC.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INFR.L or DDGC.L?

On fees, DDGC.L is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INFR.L or DDGC.L?

DDGC.L is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

What is the main difference between INFR.L and DDGC.L?

INFR.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while DDGC.L is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for INFR.L and 0.26% for DDGC.L.