DDGC.L vs. GBDV.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (DDGC.L) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L).
DDGC.L and GBDV.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DDGC.L is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 12, 2025. GBDV.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index. It was launched on May 14, 2013.
Performance
DDGC.L vs. GBDV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DDGC.L vs. GBDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDGC.L Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | -0.21% | 2.89% |
GBDV.L SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 3.28% | 1.76% |
Different Trading Currencies
DDGC.L is traded in USD, while GBDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GBDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDGC.L achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than GBDV.L's 3.28% return.
DDGC.L
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GBDV.L
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 6M
- 6.44%
- 1Y
- 17.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.14%
- 10Y*
- 7.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DDGC.L vs. GBDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDGC.L has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than GBDV.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DDGC.L vs. GBDV.L — Risk / Return Rank
DDGC.L
GBDV.L
DDGC.L vs. GBDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (DDGC.L) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDGC.L | GBDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.50 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between DDGC.L and GBDV.L is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DDGC.L vs. GBDV.L - Dividend Comparison
DDGC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDGC.L Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBDV.L SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 4.62% | 4.91% | 4.49% | 4.87% | 5.05% | 4.26% | 4.41% | 4.41% | 5.18% | 4.26% | 4.74% | 5.72% |
Drawdowns
DDGC.L vs. GBDV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDGC.L drawdown since its inception was -7.79%, smaller than the maximum GBDV.L drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDGC.L and GBDV.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDGC.L | GBDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.79% | -34.77% | +26.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.13% | -4.01% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -5.20% | +3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.91% | — |
Volatility
DDGC.L vs. GBDV.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DDGC.L | GBDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 12.78% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 13.95% | -1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 15.84% | -3.69% |