INEQ vs. CIL
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL).
INEQ and CIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INEQ is an actively managed fund by Columbia Threadneedle. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016. CIL is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Aug 19, 2015.
Performance
INEQ vs. CIL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
INEQ vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 4.95% | 39.85% | 6.02% | 20.88% | -5.95% | 10.18% | -0.52% | 15.83% | -18.30% | 24.88% |
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 5.44% | 32.99% | 3.76% | 16.29% | -16.00% | 11.07% | 7.21% | 19.13% | -13.34% | 27.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than CIL's 5.44% return.
INEQ
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -5.63%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 32.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- —
CIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 29.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INEQ vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both INEQ and CIL have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Return for Risk
INEQ vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank
INEQ
CIL
INEQ vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INEQ | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 2.29 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 3.15 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.54 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.32 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | 15.10 | -3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INEQ | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.29 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.53 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.44 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between INEQ and CIL is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
INEQ vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison
INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.40%, more than CIL's 2.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 9.40% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% | 0.00% |
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 2.38% | 2.70% | 3.46% | 2.91% | 2.41% | 3.04% | 1.73% | 2.69% | 2.85% | 2.17% | 2.34% | 0.43% |
Drawdowns
INEQ vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than CIL's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and CIL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| INEQ | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -36.27% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -9.66% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | -29.89% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -0.58% | -5.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -6.66% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 1.73% | +0.89% |
Volatility
INEQ vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison
Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) has a higher volatility of 6.97% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that INEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| INEQ | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.97% | 0.00% | +6.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 5.76% | +4.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.96% | 13.30% | +3.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 16.67% | -1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 17.32% | -0.99% |