PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INE.TO vs. CU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INE.TO vs. CU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Innergex Renewable Energy Inc. (INE.TO) and Canadian Utilities Limited (CU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


INE.TO

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CU.TO

1D
0.58%
1M
4.38%
YTD
20.72%
6M
23.14%
1Y
38.79%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INE.TO vs. CU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INE.TO
Innergex Renewable Energy Inc.
0.00%72.95%-8.83%-39.57%-9.29%-29.60%67.90%40.94%-8.26%7.44%
CU.TO
Canadian Utilities Limited
20.72%28.76%15.61%-8.23%4.73%24.14%-16.53%31.01%-12.18%7.28%

Correlation

The correlation between INE.TO and CU.TO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2007

0.23

The correlation between INE.TO and CU.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

INE.TO:

CA$995.52M

CU.TO:

CA$3.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INE.TO:

CA$1.10B

CU.TO:

CA$905.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

INE.TO:

CA$745.05M

CU.TO:

CA$1.82B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INE.TO vs. CU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INE.TO

CU.TO
CU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INE.TO vs. CU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innergex Renewable Energy Inc. (INE.TO) and Canadian Utilities Limited (CU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

INE.TO vs. CU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INE.TOCU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

Drawdowns

INE.TO vs. CU.TO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INE.TOCU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

Volatility

INE.TO vs. CU.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INE.TOCU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

Dividends

INE.TO vs. CU.TO - Dividend Comparison

INE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than CU.TO's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CU.TO
Canadian Utilities Limited
3.64%4.29%5.20%5.63%4.85%4.80%5.60%4.32%5.02%3.83%3.59%3.69%
INE.TO
Innergex Renewable Energy Inc.
0.66%1.31%4.47%7.83%4.44%3.87%2.63%4.21%5.42%4.58%4.56%5.47%

Financials

INE.TO vs. CU.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innergex Renewable Energy Inc. and Canadian Utilities Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
230.64M
1.08B
(INE.TO) Total Revenue
(CU.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INE.TO and CU.TO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INE.TO and CU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer