PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDS vs. URE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDS vs. URE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDS achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly lower than URE's 14.86% return.


INDS

1D
0.69%
1M
1.76%
YTD
8.71%
6M
8.42%
1Y
12.11%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*

URE

1D
-0.69%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
14.86%
6M
16.68%
1Y
8.14%
3Y*
7.77%
5Y*
-3.59%
10Y*
2.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDS vs. URE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
8.71%7.78%-12.69%17.72%-32.68%54.61%12.62%42.25%-1.14%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
14.86%-3.65%0.35%11.58%-49.64%88.24%-28.06%57.86%-4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between INDS and URE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018

0.87

The correlation between INDS and URE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDS vs. URE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDS
INDS Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
INDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDS Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
INDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

URE
URE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
URE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
URE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
URE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
URE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDS vs. URE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INDSUREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.07

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

0.50

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

1.19

+1.80

INDS vs. URE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the URE Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDS and URE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INDS vs. URE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDS drawdown since its inception was -40.17%, smaller than the maximum URE drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDS and URE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDSUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.17%

-97.16%

+56.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-16.50%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.96%

-33.77%

+6.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.17%

-63.66%

+23.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.93%

-52.31%

+33.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-64.47%

+48.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

6.86%

-2.80%

Volatility

INDS vs. URE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) is 5.22%, while ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that INDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDSUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

10.13%

-4.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

21.01%

-8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.55%

27.95%

-11.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.19%

37.42%

-17.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

40.61%

-17.53%

INDS vs. URE - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than URE's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDS vs. URE - Dividend Comparison

INDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than URE's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
3.40%3.70%3.75%3.11%2.63%1.24%1.68%2.26%1.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
2.04%2.42%2.09%1.32%1.26%0.58%0.94%1.10%1.53%0.93%0.96%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDS and URE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URE has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to INDS (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDS dropped -40.17% vs URE's -97.16%.

On 5-year performance, INDS leads with 1.31% vs -3.59% for URE. On fees, INDS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, INDS has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, INDS has performed better with a 1.31% return vs -3.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INDS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.

INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 2.04% for URE.

INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index, while URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Pacer and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for INDS and 0.95% for URE.

INDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDS and URE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer