INDS vs. PTNQ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

INDS (Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF) and PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDS is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index, while PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INDS returned 1.31%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for PTNQ. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PTNQ.

Performance

INDS vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDS achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly higher than PTNQ's 9.80% return.

INDS

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 10.90%
• 6M: 10.40%
• 1Y: 15.25%
• 3Y*: 5.42%
• 5Y*: 1.31%
• 10Y*: —

PTNQ

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -2.03%
• YTD: 9.80%
• 6M: 8.02%
• 1Y: 24.68%
• 3Y*: 13.75%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 16.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDS vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF	10.90%	7.78%	-12.69%	17.72%	-32.68%	54.61%	12.62%	42.25%	-1.14%
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	9.80%	7.18%	15.47%	34.65%	-16.00%	13.16%	29.38%	24.00%	-0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between INDS and PTNQ is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018	0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between INDS and PTNQ has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

INDS vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDS

INDS Risk / Return Rank: 28
INDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
INDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
INDS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
INDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
INDS Martin Ratio Rank: 29

PTNQ

PTNQ Risk / Return Rank: 46
PTNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
PTNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PTNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PTNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
PTNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDS vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INDS	PTNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	1.43	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	1.93	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.26	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	2.11	-0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.77	6.92	-3.16

INDS vs. PTNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the PTNQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDS and PTNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INDS vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDS drawdown since its inception was -40.17%, which is greater than PTNQ's maximum drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDS and PTNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	INDS	PTNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.17%	-28.07%	-12.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.23%	-11.76%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.96%	-14.19%	-12.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.17%	-18.47%	-21.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.30%	-3.96%	-13.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.58%	-5.68%	-9.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.06%	3.57%	+0.49%

Volatility

INDS vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) is 4.94%, while Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a volatility of 8.54%. This indicates that INDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INDS	PTNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	8.54%	-3.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.50%	13.68%	-1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.52%	17.31%	-0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.17%	13.40%	+6.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.06%	16.51%	+6.55%

INDS vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

INDS vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison

INDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than PTNQ's 0.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF	3.34%	3.70%	3.75%	3.11%	2.63%	1.24%	1.68%	2.26%	1.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	0.80%	0.88%	1.96%	1.47%	0.62%	0.00%	0.16%	0.44%	0.45%	0.32%	0.30%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INDS and PTNQ in my portfolio?

INDS and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INDS or PTNQ?

PTNQ has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to INDS (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDS dropped -40.17% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.

Which ETF is better, INDS or PTNQ?

On 5-year performance, PTNQ leads with 10.52% vs 1.31% for INDS. On fees, INDS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, INDS has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INDS or PTNQ?

Over the 5-year period, PTNQ has performed better with a 10.52% return vs 1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INDS or PTNQ?

INDS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INDS or PTNQ?

INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.80% for PTNQ.

What is the main difference between INDS and PTNQ?

INDS is categorized as REIT, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for INDS and 0.65% for PTNQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.