PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDS vs. PTIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDS vs. PTIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDS achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly lower than PTIN's 16.65% return.


INDS

1D
0.39%
1M
0.98%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.40%
1Y
15.25%
3Y*
5.42%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*

PTIN

1D
1.26%
1M
0.13%
YTD
16.65%
6M
15.60%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
13.66%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDS vs. PTIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
10.90%7.78%-12.69%17.72%-32.68%54.61%12.62%15.08%
PTIN
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
16.65%16.17%3.36%16.04%-15.98%12.26%-0.56%6.75%

Correlation

The correlation between INDS and PTIN is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2019

0.44

The correlation between INDS and PTIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.54 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDS vs. PTIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDS
INDS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
INDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDS Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
INDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDS Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

PTIN
PTIN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PTIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIN Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIN Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDS vs. PTIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INDSPTINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.35

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.87

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

10.82

-7.05

INDS vs. PTIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the PTIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDS and PTIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INDS vs. PTIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDS drawdown since its inception was -40.17%, which is greater than PTIN's maximum drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDS and PTIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDSPTINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.17%

-21.27%

-18.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-11.55%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.96%

-13.93%

-13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.17%

-21.27%

-18.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.30%

-1.76%

-15.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-7.63%

-7.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

3.06%

+1.00%

Volatility

INDS vs. PTIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) is 4.94%, while Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that INDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDSPTINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

7.10%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

15.33%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

17.36%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.17%

14.65%

+5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.06%

14.07%

+8.99%

INDS vs. PTIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIN's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDS vs. PTIN - Dividend Comparison

INDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than PTIN's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
3.34%3.70%3.75%3.11%2.63%1.24%1.68%2.26%1.81%
PTIN
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
2.17%2.53%2.67%2.09%0.41%2.38%0.77%0.97%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDS and PTIN have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTIN has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to INDS (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDS dropped -40.17% vs PTIN's -21.27%.

On 5-year performance, PTIN leads with 6.63% vs 1.31% for INDS. On fees, INDS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, INDS has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PTIN has performed better with a 6.63% return vs 1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INDS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.

INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 2.17% for PTIN.

INDS is categorized as REIT, while PTIN is Diversified Portfolio. INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index, while PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for INDS and 0.66% for PTIN.

PTIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDS and PTIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer