INDH vs. GDMN
INDH (WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - INDH is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. INDH is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. Over the past year, INDH returned -4.33% vs 76.93% for GDMN. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDH charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.
Performance
INDH vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDH achieves a -8.93% return, which is significantly lower than GDMN's -4.13% return.
INDH
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- -4.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDMN
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- -4.13%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 76.93%
- 3Y*
- 60.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INDH vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
INDH WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund | -8.93% | 6.76% | 5.05% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -4.13% | 237.09% | 5.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDH and GDMN is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2024 | 0.17 |
INDH vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDH
GDMN
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INDH
GDMN
-
Energy
INDH
GDMN
-
Consumer Cyclical
INDH
GDMN
-
Technology
INDH
GDMN
-
Basic Materials
INDH
GDMN
Consumer Defensive
INDH
GDMN
-
Industrials
INDH
GDMN
-
Utilities
INDH
GDMN
-
Healthcare
INDH
GDMN
-
Communication Services
INDH
GDMN
-
Real Estate
INDH
GDMN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDH vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
INDH
GDMN
INDH vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund (INDH) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INDH | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.25 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 1.98 | -2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 4.68 | -5.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INDH | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | 1.26 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.80 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
INDH vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDH drawdown since its inception was -15.05%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDH and GDMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDH | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.05% | -52.82% | +37.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -39.03% | +26.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.96% | -37.06% | +26.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -18.89% | +13.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.68% | 16.51% | -11.83% |
Volatility
INDH vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund (INDH) is 4.02%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 17.94%. This indicates that INDH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDH | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 17.94% | -13.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 51.79% | -40.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.93% | 61.32% | -48.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 47.59% | -33.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 47.59% | -33.16% |
INDH vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDH has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDH vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
INDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than GDMN's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 2.82% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% |
INDH WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund | 5.77% | 5.25% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDH and GDMN have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDMN has higher volatility (17.94%) compared to INDH (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDH dropped -15.05% vs GDMN's -52.82%.
On 1-year performance, GDMN leads with 76.93% vs -4.33% for INDH. On fees, GDMN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, INDH has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 76.93% return vs -4.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDMN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for INDH.
INDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 2.82% for GDMN.
INDH is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for INDH and 0.45% for GDMN.
GDMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDH and GDMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer