INDH vs. EMMF
INDH (WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund) and EMMF (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from WisdomTree. INDH is passively managed, while EMMF is actively managed. Over the past year, INDH returned -4.33% vs 49.05% for EMMF. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INDH charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for EMMF.
Performance
INDH vs. EMMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDH achieves a -8.93% return, which is significantly lower than EMMF's 28.01% return.
INDH
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- -4.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMMF
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 11.20%
- YTD
- 28.01%
- 6M
- 29.54%
- 1Y
- 49.05%
- 3Y*
- 24.00%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- —
INDH vs. EMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
INDH WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund | -8.93% | 6.76% | 5.05% |
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 28.01% | 21.22% | 1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDH and EMMF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2024 | 0.51 |
The correlation between INDH and EMMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
INDH vs. EMMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDH
EMMF
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INDH
EMMF
Energy
INDH
EMMF
Consumer Cyclical
INDH
EMMF
Technology
INDH
EMMF
Basic Materials
INDH
EMMF
Consumer Defensive
INDH
EMMF
Industrials
INDH
EMMF
Utilities
INDH
EMMF
Healthcare
INDH
EMMF
Communication Services
INDH
EMMF
Real Estate
INDH
EMMF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDH vs. EMMF — Risk / Return Rank
INDH
EMMF
INDH vs. EMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund (INDH) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INDH | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | 2.98 | -3.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | 3.90 | -4.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.56 | -0.61 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 4.64 | -4.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 19.15 | -20.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INDH | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | 2.98 | -3.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.54 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
INDH vs. EMMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDH drawdown since its inception was -15.05%, smaller than the maximum EMMF drawdown of -32.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDH and EMMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDH | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.05% | -32.57% | +17.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -10.62% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.96% | -1.20% | -9.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -7.45% | +1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.68% | 2.57% | +2.11% |
Volatility
INDH vs. EMMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund (INDH) is 4.02%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that INDH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDH | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 7.23% | -3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 14.46% | -2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.93% | 16.57% | -3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 14.38% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 16.62% | -2.19% |
INDH vs. EMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDH has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than EMMF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDH vs. EMMF - Dividend Comparison
INDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than EMMF's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 1.85% | 2.45% | 1.30% | 1.62% | 3.48% | 2.64% | 1.93% | 2.93% | 0.66% |
INDH WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund | 5.77% | 5.25% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDH and EMMF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMMF has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to INDH (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDH dropped -15.05% vs EMMF's -32.57%.
On 1-year performance, EMMF leads with 49.05% vs -4.33% for INDH. On fees, EMMF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, INDH has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EMMF has performed better with a 49.05% return vs -4.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMMF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for INDH.
INDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 1.85% for EMMF.
Their fees differ too: 0.64% for INDH and 0.48% for EMMF.
EMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDH and EMMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer