INDEX vs. FMED
INDEX (Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight) and FMED (Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF) are both funds - INDEX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FMED is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past year, INDEX returned 28.87% vs 3.59% for FMED. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INDEX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FMED.
Performance
INDEX vs. FMED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDEX achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly higher than FMED's -9.33% return.
INDEX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
FMED
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -9.33%
- 6M
- -13.74%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INDEX vs. FMED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INDEX Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight | 11.54% | 17.77% | 24.73% | 6.37% |
FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF | -9.33% | 9.69% | 2.29% | -4.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDEX and FMED is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between INDEX and FMED has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDEX vs. FMED — Risk / Return Rank
INDEX
FMED
INDEX vs. FMED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight (INDEX) and Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INDEX | FMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.05 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 0.20 | +3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.62 | 0.45 | +15.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INDEX | FMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 0.19 | +2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | -0.05 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
INDEX vs. FMED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDEX drawdown since its inception was -38.82%, which is greater than FMED's maximum drawdown of -21.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDEX and FMED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDEX | FMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.82% | -21.84% | -16.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -18.33% | +9.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -14.95% | +14.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -7.04% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 7.96% | -6.06% |
Volatility
INDEX vs. FMED - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight (INDEX) is 2.83%, while Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that INDEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDEX | FMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 5.53% | -2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | 14.13% | -5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 18.58% | -6.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 18.38% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 18.38% | +0.27% |
INDEX vs. FMED - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDEX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FMED's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDEX vs. FMED - Dividend Comparison
INDEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while FMED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INDEX Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.97% | 1.56% | 3.25% | 1.81% | 1.53% | 1.61% | 3.09% | 1.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDEX and FMED have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMED has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to INDEX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDEX dropped -38.82% vs FMED's -21.84%.
INDEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDEX and FMED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer