INDA vs. EWM
INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) and EWM (iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - INDA tracks the MSCI India Index while EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INDA returned 6.56%/yr vs 2.59%/yr for EWM. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWM.
Performance
INDA vs. EWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDA achieves a -12.38% return, which is significantly lower than EWM's 2.45% return. Over the past 10 years, INDA has outperformed EWM with an annualized return of 6.56%, while EWM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.59% annualized return.
INDA
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- -12.38%
- 6M
- -11.33%
- 1Y
- -12.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.17%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- 6.56%
EWM
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- 1Y
- 20.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 2.59%
INDA vs. EWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | -12.38% | 2.68% | 8.63% | 17.16% | -8.94% | 21.36% | 14.83% | 6.49% | -6.67% | 36.08% |
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 2.45% | 15.74% | 19.46% | -3.61% | -6.00% | -7.40% | 3.12% | -1.41% | -6.28% | 24.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDA and EWM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2012 | 0.50 |
The correlation between INDA and EWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INDA vs. EWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDA
EWM
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INDA
EWM
Consumer Cyclical
INDA
EWM
Industrials
INDA
EWM
Energy
INDA
EWM
Technology
INDA
EWM
-
Basic Materials
INDA
EWM
Consumer Defensive
INDA
EWM
Healthcare
INDA
EWM
Communication Services
INDA
EWM
Utilities
INDA
EWM
Real Estate
INDA
EWM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDA vs. EWM — Risk / Return Rank
INDA
EWM
INDA vs. EWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INDA | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.26 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 2.65 | -3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 8.22 | -9.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INDA | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | 1.49 | -2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.33 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.16 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.07 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
INDA vs. EWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDA drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, smaller than the maximum EWM drawdown of -89.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDA and EWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDA | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.07% | -89.19% | +44.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.69% | -7.86% | -10.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -21.31% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.72% | -22.76% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.07% | -43.81% | -1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.42% | -9.46% | -9.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.57% | -31.82% | +22.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.71% | 2.53% | +5.18% |
Volatility
INDA vs. EWM - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) at 4.15%. This indicates that INDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDA | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 4.15% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 10.86% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 13.99% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.37% | 13.70% | +1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 16.29% | +4.83% |
INDA vs. EWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than EWM's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDA vs. EWM - Dividend Comparison
INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.32% | 3.47% | 3.00% | 6.48% | 1.89% | 2.91% | 3.84% | 5.58% | 5.97% | 37.54% |
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 0.27% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 0.90% | 1.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDA and EWM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INDA has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to EWM (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDA dropped -45.07% vs EWM's -89.19%.
On 10-year performance, INDA leads with 6.56% vs 2.59% for EWM. On fees, EWM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, INDA has performed better with a 6.56% return vs 2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.
EWM has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.
INDA tracks MSCI India Index, while EWM tracks MSCI Malaysia Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for INDA and 0.49% for EWM.
EWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDA and EWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer