PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDA vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDA vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDA achieves a -7.86% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, INDA has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 6.56%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.53% annualized return.


INDA

1D
0.20%
1M
0.48%
6M
-3.75%
YTD
-7.86%
1Y
-5.54%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
6.56%
ALL TIME*
5.44%

ACWI

1D
0.49%
1M
0.18%
6M
8.21%
YTD
11.28%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
12.53%
ALL TIME*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$420.02M$465.87M$510.46M
$354.20M$298.51M$312.64M

INDA vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
-7.86%2.68%8.63%17.16%-8.94%21.36%14.83%6.49%-6.67%36.08%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
11.28%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between INDA and ACWI is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012

0.61

The correlation between INDA and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

INDA vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INDA
ACWI

Financial Services

30.3%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
8.7%

Industrials

10.5%
10.8%

Energy

8.8%
3.6%

Basic Materials

8.5%
3.4%

Technology

7.1%
32.7%

Healthcare

6.4%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
4.7%

Communication Services

5.0%
8.0%

Utilities

4.2%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.6%

Financial Services

INDA
30.3%
ACWI
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

INDA
12.3%
ACWI
8.7%

Industrials

INDA
10.5%
ACWI
10.8%

Energy

INDA
8.8%
ACWI
3.6%

Basic Materials

INDA
8.5%
ACWI
3.4%

Technology

INDA
7.1%
ACWI
32.7%

Healthcare

INDA
6.4%
ACWI
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

INDA
5.6%
ACWI
4.7%

Communication Services

INDA
5.0%
ACWI
8.0%

Utilities

INDA
4.2%
ACWI
2.4%

Real Estate

INDA
1.4%
ACWI
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDA vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INDA
INDA Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
INDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
INDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDA Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INDA vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INDAACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.29

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

2.29

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.66

9.58

-10.24

INDA vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDA Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDA and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INDA vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDA drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDA and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDAACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.07%

-56.00%

+10.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.85%

-9.73%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-16.55%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.72%

-26.42%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.07%

-33.53%

-11.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.27%

-1.58%

-13.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.65%

-8.55%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.16%

2.33%

+5.83%

Volatility

INDA vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDAACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

4.03%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.19%

11.71%

+1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.11%

14.01%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.50%

16.23%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.07%

17.06%

+4.01%

INDA vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDA vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.44%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
0.00%0.00%0.76%0.16%0.00%6.44%0.27%0.99%0.94%1.09%0.90%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDA and ACWI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INDA has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to ACWI (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDA dropped -45.07% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.53% vs 6.56% for INDA. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.53% return vs 6.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.

INDA is categorized as India Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. INDA tracks MSCI India Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for INDA and 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDA and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer