INCM vs. JPST
INCM (Franklin Income Focus ETF) and JPST (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCM is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while JPST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, INCM returned 16.64% vs 4.31% for JPST. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INCM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for JPST.
Performance
INCM vs. JPST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCM achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly higher than JPST's 1.40% return.
INCM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 16.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPST
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- —
INCM vs. JPST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 6.96% | 13.07% | 6.80% | 5.76% |
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.40% | 4.99% | 5.58% | 3.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between INCM and JPST is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023 | 0.32 |
INCM vs. JPST - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INCM
JPST
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
INCM
JPST
Consumer Defensive
INCM
JPST
Utilities
INCM
JPST
Energy
INCM
JPST
Healthcare
INCM
JPST
Technology
INCM
JPST
Industrials
INCM
JPST
Basic Materials
INCM
JPST
Communication Services
INCM
JPST
Consumer Cyclical
INCM
JPST
Real Estate
INCM
JPST
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INCM vs. JPST — Risk / Return Rank
INCM
JPST
INCM vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INCM | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.20 | 8.09 | -4.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.78 | 17.60 | -12.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 3.94 | -2.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.27 | 29.35 | -24.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.29 | 145.52 | -123.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INCM | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.20 | 8.09 | -4.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 6.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | 3.20 | -1.67 |
Drawdowns
INCM vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCM drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, which is greater than JPST's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCM and JPST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INCM | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -3.28% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.19% | -0.15% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.02% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -0.08% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 0.03% | +0.72% |
Volatility
INCM vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) at 0.16%. This indicates that INCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INCM | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 0.16% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.81% | 0.35% | +3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.22% | 0.54% | +4.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.23% | 0.58% | +6.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.23% | 0.93% | +6.30% |
INCM vs. JPST - Expense Ratio Comparison
INCM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than JPST's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
INCM vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison
INCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than JPST's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 5.06% | 4.96% | 5.06% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.26% | 4.43% | 5.16% | 4.79% | 1.83% | 0.73% | 1.43% | 2.69% | 2.07% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INCM and JPST have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INCM has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to JPST (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCM dropped -7.84% vs JPST's -3.28%.
On 1-year performance, INCM leads with 16.64% vs 4.31% for JPST. On fees, JPST is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INCM has performed better with a 16.64% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPST is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for INCM.
INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 4.26% for JPST.
INCM is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while JPST is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for INCM and 0.18% for JPST.
JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.09 vs 3.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INCM and JPST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer