INCM vs. FRIAX
INCM (Franklin Income Focus ETF) and FRIAX (Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Franklin Templeton. Over the past 3 years, INCM returned 11.04%/yr vs 9.69%/yr for FRIAX. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. INCM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for FRIAX.
Performance
INCM vs. FRIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCM achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly higher than FRIAX's 5.78% return.
INCM
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.62%
FRIAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 12.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $11.73M | $12.25M | $11.49M |
INCM vs. FRIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 7.65% | 13.07% | 6.80% | 5.76% |
FRIAX Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class | 5.78% | 12.02% | 7.29% | 5.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between INCM and FRIAX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023 | 0.72 |
The correlation between INCM and FRIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INCM vs. FRIAX — Risk / Return Rank
INCM
FRIAX
INCM vs. FRIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) and Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class (FRIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INCM | FRIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.55 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 4.00 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.73 | 15.16 | +2.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INCM vs. FRIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCM drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum FRIAX drawdown of -43.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCM and FRIAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INCM | FRIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -43.23% | +35.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.19% | -3.06% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.84% | -7.08% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.07% | -3.90% | +2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 0.81% | -0.02% |
Volatility
INCM vs. FRIAX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) and Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class (FRIAX) have volatilities of 1.48% and 1.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INCM | FRIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 1.51% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.36% | 3.72% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.50% | 5.00% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.21% | 7.90% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.21% | 9.20% | -1.99% |
INCM vs. FRIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
INCM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FRIAX's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
INCM vs. FRIAX - Dividend Comparison
INCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than FRIAX's 5.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRIAX Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class | 5.28% | 5.75% | 5.74% | 5.67% | 5.24% | 6.70% | 5.37% | 5.25% | 5.80% | 5.20% | 4.92% | 5.93% |
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 5.18% | 4.96% | 5.06% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INCM and FRIAX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRIAX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to INCM (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCM dropped -7.84% vs FRIAX's -43.23%.
INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INCM and FRIAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer