INCM vs. DRAI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INCM (Franklin Income Focus ETF) and DRAI (Draco Evolution AI ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, INCM returned 15.73% vs 41.96% for DRAI. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INCM charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DRAI.

Performance

INCM vs. DRAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) and Draco Evolution AI ETF (DRAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCM achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than DRAI's 18.51% return.

INCM

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 6.84%
• 1Y: 15.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRAI

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 7.63%
• YTD: 18.51%
• 6M: 16.55%
• 1Y: 41.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INCM vs. DRAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF	6.45%	13.07%	2.38%
DRAI Draco Evolution AI ETF	18.51%	33.68%	-7.70%

Correlation

The correlation between INCM and DRAI is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024	0.52

The correlation between INCM and DRAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

INCM vs. DRAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INCM	DRAI
Financial Services	8.2%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	5.3%
Utilities	4.9%	1.8%
Energy	3.8%	2.4%
Healthcare	2.6%	7.0%
Technology	2.4%	45.2%
Industrials	1.9%	6.6%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.7%
Communication Services	1.7%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	1.5%	10.1%
Real Estate	0.0%	1.3%

Return for Risk

INCM vs. DRAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCM

INCM Risk / Return Rank: 89
INCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
INCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
INCM Omega Ratio Rank: 89
INCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
INCM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

DRAI

DRAI Risk / Return Rank: 87
DRAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
DRAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DRAI Omega Ratio Rank: 88
DRAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DRAI Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCM vs. DRAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) and Draco Evolution AI ETF (DRAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INCM	DRAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.01	2.95	+0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.49	3.91	+0.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.55	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.95	5.84	-0.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.86	16.23	+4.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INCM vs. DRAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCM Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is comparable to the DRAI Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCM and DRAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INCM	DRAI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.01	2.95	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.51	1.33	+0.18

Drawdowns

INCM vs. DRAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCM drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum DRAI drawdown of -13.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCM and DRAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	INCM	DRAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.84%	-13.69%	+5.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.19%	-7.22%	+4.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-0.50%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.09%	-4.08%	+2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	2.59%	-1.83%

Volatility

INCM vs. DRAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) is 1.66%, while Draco Evolution AI ETF (DRAI) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that INCM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INCM	DRAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.66%	5.23%	-3.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.82%	9.87%	-6.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.25%	14.37%	-9.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.23%	16.75%	-9.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.23%	16.75%	-9.52%

INCM vs. DRAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAI's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

INCM vs. DRAI - Dividend Comparison

INCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, more than DRAI's 1.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DRAI Draco Evolution AI ETF	1.30%	1.48%	2.18%	0.00%
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF	5.08%	4.96%	5.06%	3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INCM and DRAI in my portfolio?

INCM and DRAI have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INCM or DRAI?

DRAI has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to INCM (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCM dropped -7.84% vs DRAI's -13.69%.

Which ETF is better, INCM or DRAI?

On 1-year performance, DRAI leads with 41.96% vs 15.73% for INCM. On fees, INCM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, INCM has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INCM or DRAI?

Over the 1-year period, DRAI has performed better with a 41.96% return vs 15.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INCM or DRAI?

INCM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DRAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INCM or DRAI?

INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 1.30% for DRAI.

What is the main difference between INCM and DRAI?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Draco Evolution. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for INCM and 1.50% for DRAI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.