INCE vs. SBIT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). INCE is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, INCE returned 26.00% vs 98.77% for SBIT. Their -0.26 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. INCE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

INCE vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCE achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.

INCE

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 8.29%
• YTD: 14.91%
• 1Y: 26.00%
• 3Y*: 15.52%
• 5Y*: 10.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.06%

SBIT

• 1D: 5.60%
• 1M: -6.04%
• 6M: 32.41%
• YTD: 39.44%
• 1Y: 98.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -42.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	$621.36K	$657.47K	$945.62K
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	$29.57M	$32.71M	$46.48M

INCE vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	14.91%	15.92%	4.95%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	39.44%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between INCE and SBIT is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.26

Return for Risk

INCE vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INCE

INCE Risk / Return Rank: 96
INCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
INCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INCE Omega Ratio Rank: 95
INCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
INCE Martin Ratio Rank: 95

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INCE vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INCE	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.09	1.27	+1.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.48	1.95	+2.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.23	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.24	2.35	+2.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.20	5.19	+15.01

INCE vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCE Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCE and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INCE vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCE drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCE and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	INCE	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.95%	-91.35%	+57.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.90%	-47.94%	+43.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-77.87%	+77.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.22%	-69.07%	+65.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	21.67%	-20.40%

Volatility

INCE vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is 2.46%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that INCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INCE	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	18.09%	-15.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.15%	67.10%	-60.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.40%	88.65%	-80.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.25%	96.10%	-82.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.60%	96.10%	-80.50%

INCE vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

INCE vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

INCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than SBIT's 4.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	4.84%	4.71%	3.25%	1.75%	1.68%	1.41%	1.40%	1.31%	1.55%	1.44%	0.50%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	4.03%	0.52%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INCE and SBIT in my portfolio?

INCE and SBIT have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INCE or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to INCE (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCE dropped -33.95% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, INCE or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 26.00% for INCE. On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INCE or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 26.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INCE or SBIT?

INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INCE or SBIT?

INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 4.03% for SBIT.

What is the main difference between INCE and SBIT?

INCE is categorized as Dividend, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for INCE and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.