PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INCE vs. FGDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

INCE vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

INCE vs. FGDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
7.36%15.92%10.70%13.87%6.12%
FGDL
Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF
7.93%64.15%27.31%12.92%0.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCE achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly lower than FGDL's 7.93% return.


INCE

1D
1.23%
1M
-2.97%
YTD
7.36%
6M
11.87%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*

FGDL

1D
3.39%
1M
-11.22%
YTD
7.93%
6M
20.34%
1Y
48.63%
3Y*
33.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


INCE vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FGDL's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

INCE vs. FGDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCE
INCE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
INCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
INCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FGDL
FGDL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FGDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FGDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCE vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INCEFGDLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

1.75

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.17

2.16

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

2.64

-0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.86

9.52

+0.34

INCE vs. FGDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCE Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the FGDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCE and FGDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INCEFGDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.75

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.52

-0.71

Correlation

The correlation between INCE and FGDL is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

INCE vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison

INCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, while FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
4.80%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%
FGDL
Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

INCE vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCE drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, which is greater than FGDL's maximum drawdown of -19.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCE and FGDL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


INCEFGDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.95%

-19.23%

-14.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-19.23%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-13.76%

+10.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-3.34%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

5.33%

-3.10%

Volatility

INCE vs. FGDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is 3.23%, while Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) has a volatility of 10.75%. This indicates that INCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


INCEFGDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

10.75%

-7.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.31%

24.37%

-18.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.74%

28.00%

-14.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.32%

18.96%

-5.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.80%

18.96%

-3.16%