INCE vs. AIRR
INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. INCE is actively managed, while AIRR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INCE returned 11.19%/yr vs 25.46%/yr for AIRR. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INCE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
INCE vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCE achieves a 13.74% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.74% return.
INCE
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 13.74%
- 6M
- 14.18%
- 1Y
- 26.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 31.74%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 67.12%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- 25.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
INCE vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 13.74% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 32.72% | -2.14% | 19.66% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.74% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 31.43% | -2.08% | 33.01% | 17.17% | 33.97% | -20.57% | 16.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between INCE and AIRR is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.62 |
The correlation between INCE and AIRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INCE vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INCE
AIRR
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
INCE
AIRR
Consumer Defensive
INCE
AIRR
-
Energy
INCE
AIRR
Utilities
INCE
AIRR
-
Technology
INCE
AIRR
Financial Services
INCE
AIRR
Basic Materials
INCE
AIRR
-
Healthcare
INCE
AIRR
-
Communication Services
INCE
AIRR
-
Consumer Cyclical
INCE
AIRR
-
Real Estate
INCE
-
AIRR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INCE vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
INCE
AIRR
INCE vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INCE | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.40 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.18 | 5.01 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.39 | 18.33 | +1.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INCE vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCE drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCE and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INCE | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -42.37% | +8.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.90% | -13.09% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.01% | -27.95% | +13.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.40% | -27.95% | +9.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -1.89% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -7.48% | +4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 3.57% | -2.26% |
Volatility
INCE vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is 2.42%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that INCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INCE | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 9.32% | -6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.07% | 20.81% | -14.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.41% | 26.19% | -17.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 25.45% | -12.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 26.36% | -10.68% |
INCE vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
INCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
INCE vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
INCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 4.70% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INCE and AIRR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIRR has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to INCE (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCE dropped -33.95% vs AIRR's -42.37%.
On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 25.46% vs 11.19% for INCE. On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 25.46% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.
INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.
INCE is categorized as Dividend, while AIRR is Building & Construction. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for INCE and 0.69% for AIRR.
INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INCE and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer