INBX vs. ESLT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

INBX (Inhibrx, Inc.) and ESLT (Elbit Systems Ltd) are both stocks. INBX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while ESLT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past year, INBX returned 543.41% vs 98.98% for ESLT. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

INBX vs. ESLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INBX achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly lower than ESLT's 48.00% return.

INBX

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: -21.83%
• YTD: 16.71%
• 6M: 15.87%
• 1Y: 543.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ESLT

• 1D: -6.48%
• 1M: 9.58%
• YTD: 48.00%
• 6M: 66.16%
• 1Y: 98.98%
• 3Y*: 60.86%
• 5Y*: 46.38%
• 10Y*: 26.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INBX vs. ESLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
INBX Inhibrx, Inc.	16.71%	412.99%	18.46%
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd	48.00%	125.14%	34.52%

Correlation

The correlation between INBX and ESLT is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2024	0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap INBX : $1.44B ESLT : $41.10B
EPS INBX : -$8.40 ESLT : $12.36
PS Ratio INBX : 1.10K ESLT : 4.93
Total Revenue (TTM) INBX : $1.30M ESLT : $8.23B
Gross Profit (TTM) INBX : -$508.00K ESLT : $2.03B
EBITDA (TTM) INBX : -$117.63M ESLT : $861.06M

Return for Risk

INBX vs. ESLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INBX

INBX Risk / Return Rank: 98
INBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
INBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
INBX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
INBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INBX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

ESLT

ESLT Risk / Return Rank: 90
ESLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ESLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ESLT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
ESLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ESLT Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INBX vs. ESLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INBX	ESLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.24	2.26	+1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.25	3.19	+2.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.68	1.38	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.18	3.83	+10.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	34.82	10.61	+24.21

INBX vs. ESLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INBX Sharpe Ratio is 4.24, which is higher than the ESLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INBX and ESLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INBX vs. ESLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INBX drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, smaller than the maximum ESLT drawdown of -53.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INBX and ESLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	INBX	ESLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.84%	-53.79%	+13.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.66%	-25.98%	-12.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.98%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.00%	-15.71%	-19.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.07%	-13.91%	-3.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.71%	9.36%	+6.35%

Volatility

INBX vs. ESLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX) is 17.27%, while Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) has a volatility of 19.89%. This indicates that INBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INBX	ESLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.27%	19.89%	-2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.72%	35.93%	+25.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	129.27%	44.11%	+85.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	100.32%	33.66%	+66.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	100.32%	29.42%	+70.90%

Dividends

INBX vs. ESLT - Dividend Comparison

INBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd	0.36%	0.47%	0.77%	0.94%	1.22%	1.03%	1.28%	1.14%	1.54%	1.32%	1.57%	1.63%
INBX Inhibrx, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INBX and ESLT in my portfolio?

INBX and ESLT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INBX or ESLT?

ESLT has higher volatility (19.89%) compared to INBX (17.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INBX dropped -39.84% vs ESLT's -53.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.24 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.