IMVP vs. VEXC
IMVP (Invesco India ETF) and VEXC (Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - IMVP tracks the FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index while VEXC tracks the FTSE Emerging ex China Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMVP charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VEXC.
Performance
IMVP vs. VEXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMVP achieves a -16.08% return, which is significantly lower than VEXC's 20.21% return.
IMVP
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- YTD
- -16.08%
- 6M
- -14.80%
- 1Y
- -16.87%
- 3Y*
- 2.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
VEXC
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 20.21%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMVP vs. VEXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IMVP Invesco India ETF | -16.08% | 3.55% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 20.21% | 4.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMVP and VEXC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMVP vs. VEXC — Risk / Return Rank
IMVP
VEXC
IMVP vs. VEXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco India ETF (IMVP) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMVP | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMVP | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 2.21 | -2.10 |
Drawdowns
IMVP vs. VEXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMVP drawdown since its inception was -64.54%, which is greater than VEXC's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMVP and VEXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMVP | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.54% | -12.42% | -52.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.71% | -1.20% | -22.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.70% | -2.23% | -14.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.16% | — | — |
Volatility
IMVP vs. VEXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMVP | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 18.89% | -2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 18.89% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 18.89% | +0.70% |
IMVP vs. VEXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMVP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than VEXC's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMVP vs. VEXC - Dividend Comparison
IMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, more than VEXC's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMVP Invesco India ETF | 8.81% | 7.39% | 8.48% | 2.08% | 14.07% | 6.95% | 0.72% | 36.35% | 0.96% | 1.01% | 1.18% | 0.61% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 0.74% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMVP and VEXC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IMVP.
IMVP has the higher dividend yield at 8.81%, compared with 0.74% for VEXC.
IMVP tracks FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index, while VEXC tracks FTSE Emerging ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IMVP and 0.07% for VEXC.
Find the right allocation for IMVP and VEXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer