IMVP vs. FTHF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IMVP (Invesco India ETF) and FTHF (First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - IMVP tracks the FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index while FTHF tracks the Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IMVP returned -11.95% vs 76.97% for FTHF. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IMVP charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTHF.

Performance

IMVP vs. FTHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco India ETF (IMVP) and First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMVP achieves a -13.59% return, which is significantly lower than FTHF's 35.77% return.

IMVP

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 1.29%
• 6M: -12.62%
• YTD: -13.59%
• 1Y: -11.95%
• 3Y*: 2.31%
• 5Y*: 2.53%
• 10Y*: 7.75%
• ALL TIME*: 3.41%

FTHF

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -4.48%
• 6M: 18.25%
• YTD: 35.77%
• 1Y: 76.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 38.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FTHF First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF	$312.20K	$492.12K	$543.01K
IMVP Invesco India ETF	$2.34M	$1.44M	$1.19M

IMVP vs. FTHF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IMVP Invesco India ETF	-13.59%	1.30%	9.07%	13.49%
FTHF First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF	35.77%	65.30%	-8.14%	18.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IMVP and FTHF is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023	0.40

Return for Risk

IMVP vs. FTHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMVP

IMVP Risk / Return Rank: 4
IMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
IMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 3
IMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
IMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 3

FTHF

FTHF Risk / Return Rank: 86
FTHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FTHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FTHF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FTHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FTHF Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMVP vs. FTHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco India ETF (IMVP) and First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMVP	FTHF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	2.26	-2.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.96	2.74	-3.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.39	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.60	3.68	-4.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.16	12.69	-13.85

IMVP vs. FTHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMVP Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the FTHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMVP and FTHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMVP vs. FTHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMVP drawdown since its inception was -64.54%, which is greater than FTHF's maximum drawdown of -21.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMVP and FTHF.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMVP	FTHF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.54%	-21.05%	-43.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.00%	-21.05%	+1.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.44%	-15.06%	-6.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.75%	-4.54%	-12.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.28%	6.09%	+4.19%

Volatility

IMVP vs. FTHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco India ETF (IMVP) is 3.39%, while First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) has a volatility of 13.92%. This indicates that IMVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMVP	FTHF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	13.92%	-10.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.44%	31.87%	-17.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.54%	34.32%	-17.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.17%	27.88%	-11.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.51%	27.88%	-8.37%

IMVP vs. FTHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMVP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHF's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMVP vs. FTHF - Dividend Comparison

IMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.66%, more than FTHF's 3.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTHF First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF	3.36%	4.40%	3.34%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IMVP Invesco India ETF	11.66%	7.39%	8.48%	2.08%	14.07%	6.95%	0.72%	36.35%	0.96%	1.01%	1.18%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMVP and FTHF in my portfolio?

IMVP and FTHF have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMVP or FTHF?

FTHF has higher volatility (13.92%) compared to IMVP (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMVP dropped -64.54% vs FTHF's -21.05%.

Which ETF is better, IMVP or FTHF?

On 1-year performance, FTHF leads with 76.97% vs -11.95% for IMVP. On fees, FTHF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, IMVP has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMVP or FTHF?

Over the 1-year period, FTHF has performed better with a 76.97% return vs -11.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMVP or FTHF?

FTHF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IMVP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMVP or FTHF?

IMVP has the higher dividend yield at 11.66%, compared with 3.36% for FTHF.

What is the main difference between IMVP and FTHF?

IMVP tracks FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index, while FTHF tracks Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IMVP and 0.75% for FTHF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.