IMV.L vs. CSH2.L
IMV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS) and CSH2.L (Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - IMV.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while CSH2.L is a Money Market fund actively managed by Amundi. IMV.L is passively managed, while CSH2.L is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMV.L returned 7.68%/yr vs 2.07%/yr for CSH2.L. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. IMV.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSH2.L.
Performance
IMV.L vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMV.L achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly higher than CSH2.L's 1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, IMV.L has outperformed CSH2.L with an annualized return of 7.68%, while CSH2.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.07% annualized return.
IMV.L
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 8.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.68%
CSH2.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
IMV.L vs. CSH2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMV.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS | 4.72% | 17.66% | 6.63% | 8.56% | -7.83% | 13.68% | 1.50% | 16.37% | -2.91% | 13.29% |
CSH2.L Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP | 1.74% | 4.67% | 5.61% | 4.72% | 1.54% | 0.13% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.70% | 0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMV.L and CSH2.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2015 | -0.00 |
IMV.L vs. CSH2.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMV.L
CSH2.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
IMV.L
CSH2.L
Industrials
IMV.L
CSH2.L
Consumer Defensive
IMV.L
CSH2.L
Healthcare
IMV.L
CSH2.L
Utilities
IMV.L
CSH2.L
Communication Services
IMV.L
CSH2.L
Energy
IMV.L
CSH2.L
Basic Materials
IMV.L
CSH2.L
Consumer Cyclical
IMV.L
CSH2.L
Technology
IMV.L
CSH2.L
Real Estate
IMV.L
CSH2.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMV.L vs. CSH2.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMV.L
CSH2.L
IMV.L vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMV.L | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -13.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 4.37 | -3.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 27.66 | -26.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | 159.04 | -156.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMV.L | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 8.05 | -7.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 6.49 | -5.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 4.68 | -4.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 4.62 | -3.91 |
Drawdowns
IMV.L vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMV.L drawdown since its inception was -24.48%, which is greater than CSH2.L's maximum drawdown of -0.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMV.L and CSH2.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMV.L | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.48% | -0.37% | -24.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -0.16% | -8.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.50% | -0.29% | -8.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.42% | -0.29% | -17.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.48% | -0.37% | -24.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | 0.00% | -4.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.57% | -0.00% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 0.03% | +2.80% |
Volatility
IMV.L vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) at 0.08%. This indicates that IMV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMV.L | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 0.08% | +2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.71% | 0.25% | +7.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.13% | 0.54% | +8.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 0.56% | +10.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 0.44% | +11.87% |
IMV.L vs. CSH2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMV.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH2.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMV.L vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IMV.L nor CSH2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMV.L and CSH2.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IMV.L.
IMV.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while CSH2.L is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IMV.L and 0.07% for CSH2.L.
Find the right allocation for IMV.L and CSH2.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer