IMTB vs. AGGH
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH).
IMTB and AGGH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMTB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Universal 5-10 Years Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2016. AGGH is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Feb 14, 2022.
Performance
IMTB vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMTB vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | -0.09% | 8.88% | 1.94% | 6.10% | -9.38% |
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.04% | 8.23% | 1.97% | 8.47% | -8.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMTB achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than AGGH's 0.04% return.
IMTB
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- —
AGGH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMTB vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IMTB vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank
IMTB
AGGH
IMTB vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMTB | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.42 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 0.64 | +1.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.08 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 0.56 | +1.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | 1.52 | +4.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMTB | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.42 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.26 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTB and AGGH is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IMTB vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison
IMTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than AGGH's 7.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | 4.47% | 4.40% | 4.42% | 4.13% | 2.90% | 2.49% | 2.63% | 2.91% | 3.04% | 2.75% | 0.40% |
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 7.57% | 7.54% | 8.97% | 9.51% | 2.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IMTB vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTB drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, which is greater than AGGH's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTB and AGGH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTB | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -13.26% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -6.50% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -2.01% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -4.57% | +0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 2.40% | -1.52% |
Volatility
IMTB vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) is 1.73%, while Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) has a volatility of 1.87%. This indicates that IMTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMTB | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | 1.87% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 3.49% | -0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 8.56% | -4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.24% | 8.57% | -2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 8.57% | -3.37% |