PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTB vs. AGGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IMTB vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IMTB vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IMTB
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
-0.09%8.88%1.94%6.10%-9.38%
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
0.04%8.23%1.97%8.47%-8.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMTB achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than AGGH's 0.04% return.


IMTB

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
-0.09%
6M
1.16%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*

AGGH

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
0.04%
6M
1.83%
1Y
3.61%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IMTB vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IMTB vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTB
IMTB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IMTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTB Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGH
AGGH Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AGGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGH Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGH Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTB vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMTBAGGHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

0.42

+0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.73

0.64

+1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.08

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

0.56

+1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.33

1.52

+4.81

IMTB vs. AGGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTB Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the AGGH Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTB and AGGH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMTBAGGHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

0.42

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.26

+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between IMTB and AGGH is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IMTB vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison

IMTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than AGGH's 7.57% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IMTB
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
4.47%4.40%4.42%4.13%2.90%2.49%2.63%2.91%3.04%2.75%0.40%
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
7.57%7.54%8.97%9.51%2.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IMTB vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTB drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, which is greater than AGGH's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTB and AGGH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTBAGGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.15%

-13.26%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-6.50%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-2.01%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-4.57%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

2.40%

-1.52%

Volatility

IMTB vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) is 1.73%, while Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) has a volatility of 1.87%. This indicates that IMTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IMTBAGGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.73%

1.87%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

3.49%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

8.56%

-4.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.24%

8.57%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.20%

8.57%

-3.37%