PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMRA vs. TSMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMRA vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMRA achieves a 30.26% return, which is significantly lower than TSMY's 37.04% return.


IMRA

1D
-0.83%
1M
9.36%
YTD
30.26%
6M
0.68%
1Y
-32.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMY

1D
-1.37%
1M
7.48%
YTD
37.04%
6M
39.21%
1Y
92.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMRA vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IMRA and TSMY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMRA vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMRA
IMRA Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
IMRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMRA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IMRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMRA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMY
TSMY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMRA vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMRATSMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.50

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

5.98

-6.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

22.18

-23.04

IMRA vs. TSMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMRA Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the TSMY Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMRA and TSMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMRATSMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

3.21

-3.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

1.56

-1.74

Drawdowns

IMRA vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMRA drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than TSMY's maximum drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMRA and TSMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMRATSMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.55%

-31.15%

-30.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.55%

-15.50%

-46.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.71%

-1.37%

-39.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.21%

-5.51%

-22.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.93%

4.17%

+33.76%

Volatility

IMRA vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) have volatilities of 9.53% and 9.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMRATSMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.53%

9.52%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.61%

22.68%

+20.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.89%

28.87%

+31.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.39%

33.22%

+28.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.39%

33.22%

+28.17%

IMRA vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMRA has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMRA vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison

IMRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 108.66%, more than TSMY's 52.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IMRA
Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF
108.66%188.74%0.00%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
52.19%56.76%13.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMRA and TSMY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMRA has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to TSMY (9.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMRA dropped -61.55% vs TSMY's -31.15%.

On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 92.13% vs -32.66% for IMRA. On fees, IMRA is cheaper at 0.98% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 92.13% return vs -32.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMRA is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSMY.

IMRA has the higher dividend yield at 108.66%, compared with 52.19% for TSMY.

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for IMRA and 0.99% for TSMY.

TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMRA and TSMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer