IMRA vs. HYTI
IMRA (Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF) and HYTI (FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IMRA returned -34.37% vs 6.20% for HYTI. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMRA charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for HYTI.
Performance
IMRA vs. HYTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMRA achieves a 26.43% return, which is significantly higher than HYTI's 1.84% return.
IMRA
- 1D
- -3.17%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 26.43%
- 6M
- 17.17%
- 1Y
- -34.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYTI
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMRA vs. HYTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IMRA Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 26.43% | -34.78% |
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 1.84% | 6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMRA and HYTI is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMRA vs. HYTI — Risk / Return Rank
IMRA
HYTI
IMRA vs. HYTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) and FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMRA | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.31 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 2.62 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 11.02 | -11.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMRA vs. HYTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMRA drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than HYTI's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMRA and HYTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMRA | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -4.47% | -57.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.55% | -2.38% | -59.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.45% | -0.21% | -42.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.79% | -0.45% | -28.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.21% | 0.56% | +38.65% |
Volatility
IMRA vs. HYTI - Volatility Comparison
Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) has a higher volatility of 13.18% compared to FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) at 1.02%. This indicates that IMRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMRA | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.18% | 1.02% | +12.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.42% | 3.10% | +40.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.30% | 3.86% | +56.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.90% | 5.16% | +55.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.90% | 5.16% | +55.74% |
IMRA vs. HYTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMRA has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than HYTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMRA vs. HYTI - Dividend Comparison
IMRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 111.95%, more than HYTI's 10.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 10.40% | 8.10% |
IMRA Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 111.95% | 188.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMRA and HYTI have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMRA has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to HYTI (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMRA dropped -61.55% vs HYTI's -4.47%.
On 1-year performance, HYTI leads with 6.20% vs -34.37% for IMRA. On fees, HYTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, HYTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HYTI has performed better with a 6.20% return vs -34.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for IMRA.
IMRA has the higher dividend yield at 111.95%, compared with 10.40% for HYTI.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for IMRA and 0.65% for HYTI.
HYTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMRA and HYTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer