PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMOAX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMOAX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund (IMOAX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMOAX achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's 9.37% return.


IMOAX

1D
0.15%
1M
3.06%
YTD
5.63%
6M
6.11%
1Y
16.27%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
5.33%
10Y*
6.86%

FRGAX

1D
0.22%
1M
4.20%
YTD
9.37%
6M
9.79%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMOAX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IMOAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund
5.63%14.86%9.81%12.66%-1.08%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
9.37%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between IMOAX and FRGAX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022

0.96

The correlation between IMOAX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMOAX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMOAX
IMOAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IMOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IMOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMOAX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund (IMOAX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMOAXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

2.55

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.13

3.61

-0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.48

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

3.27

-0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.98

14.61

-2.63

IMOAX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMOAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMOAX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMOAXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.55

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

1.54

-0.93

Drawdowns

IMOAX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMOAX drawdown since its inception was -37.71%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOAX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMOAXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.71%

-11.77%

-25.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-7.03%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.37%

-11.77%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-1.58%

-3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

1.57%

-0.18%

Volatility

IMOAX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund (IMOAX) is 2.37%, while Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that IMOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMOAXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

2.75%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.20%

7.19%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.70%

9.03%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.18%

10.31%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.96%

10.31%

-1.35%

IMOAX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMOAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMOAX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

IMOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, more than FRGAX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.83%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IMOAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund
5.97%6.31%4.98%3.65%1.55%8.17%4.08%5.74%10.16%7.86%5.53%6.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IMOAX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRGAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to IMOAX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOAX dropped -37.71% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMOAX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer