PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMLAX vs. TISVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMLAX vs. TISVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund (IMLAX) and Transamerica International Small Cap Value (TISVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMLAX achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly lower than TISVX's 9.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMLAX having a 8.80% annualized return and TISVX not far ahead at 9.14%.


IMLAX

1D
0.13%
1M
4.04%
YTD
7.58%
6M
8.43%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
8.80%

TISVX

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.86%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.40%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
9.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMLAX vs. TISVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMLAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund
7.58%17.98%13.11%15.70%-17.36%11.37%16.92%17.82%-8.54%15.88%
TISVX
Transamerica International Small Cap Value
9.29%30.68%5.53%17.39%-17.32%12.40%8.91%25.49%-16.32%30.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IMLAX and TISVX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.75

The correlation between IMLAX and TISVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMLAX vs. TISVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMLAX
IMLAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IMLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IMLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TISVX
TISVX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TISVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TISVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TISVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TISVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TISVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMLAX vs. TISVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund (IMLAX) and Transamerica International Small Cap Value (TISVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMLAXTISVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.22

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.53

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

5.06

+7.19

IMLAX vs. TISVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the TISVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMLAX and TISVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMLAXTISVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.19

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.46

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.54

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.47

+0.03

Drawdowns

IMLAX vs. TISVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMLAX drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, which is greater than TISVX's maximum drawdown of -38.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMLAX and TISVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMLAXTISVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.65%

-38.08%

-8.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-10.94%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-14.00%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

-36.52%

+11.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.36%

-38.08%

+10.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.39%

+2.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-8.30%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

3.30%

-1.58%

Volatility

IMLAX vs. TISVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund (IMLAX) is 2.76%, while Transamerica International Small Cap Value (TISVX) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that IMLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TISVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMLAXTISVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

4.10%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.88%

11.21%

-3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.90%

14.03%

-4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.98%

16.84%

-4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.16%

16.89%

-4.73%

IMLAX vs. TISVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMLAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than TISVX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMLAX vs. TISVX - Dividend Comparison

IMLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than TISVX's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMLAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund
6.42%6.90%6.44%3.39%3.62%8.40%4.06%7.35%15.09%9.95%6.99%7.99%
TISVX
Transamerica International Small Cap Value
4.09%4.47%6.04%3.00%3.62%3.78%1.01%2.11%8.34%3.01%2.86%6.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMLAX and TISVX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TISVX has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to IMLAX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMLAX dropped -46.65% vs TISVX's -38.08%.

IMLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMLAX and TISVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer