PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMID.L vs. UTIL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF (IMID.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IMID.L is traded in USD, while UTIL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UTIL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMID.L achieves a -95.51% return, which is significantly lower than UTIL.L's 15.29% return. Over the past 10 years, IMID.L has underperformed UTIL.L with an annualized return of -18.50%, while UTIL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.


IMID.L

1D
0.38%
1M
1.62%
6M
-95.56%
YTD
-95.51%
1Y
-95.00%
3Y*
-58.96%
5Y*
-41.77%
10Y*
-18.50%

UTIL.L

1D
-1.42%
1M
2.75%
6M
13.25%
YTD
15.29%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
20.74%
5Y*
11.62%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMID.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF
-95.51%22.16%16.31%21.65%-17.64%17.85%16.14%25.35%-9.83%22.56%
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
15.29%51.98%-4.93%16.67%-12.37%0.89%21.72%26.80%-1.46%24.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IMID.L and UTIL.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between IMID.L and UTIL.L has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMID.L
UTIL.L

Technology

31.7%

-

Financial Services

15.0%

-

Industrials

11.8%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%

-

Communication Services

8.2%

-

Healthcare

7.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.3%

-

Basic Materials

4.0%

-

Energy

3.7%

-

Utilities

2.3%
95.3%

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Technology

IMID.L
31.7%
UTIL.L

-

Financial Services

IMID.L
15.0%
UTIL.L

-

Industrials

IMID.L
11.8%
UTIL.L
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IMID.L
9.1%
UTIL.L

-

Communication Services

IMID.L
8.2%
UTIL.L

-

Healthcare

IMID.L
7.7%
UTIL.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IMID.L
4.3%
UTIL.L

-

Basic Materials

IMID.L
4.0%
UTIL.L

-

Energy

IMID.L
3.7%
UTIL.L

-

Utilities

IMID.L
2.3%
UTIL.L
95.3%

Real Estate

IMID.L
2.1%
UTIL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMID.L vs. UTIL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMID.L
IMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
IMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

UTIL.L
UTIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF (IMID.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMID.LUTIL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.55

1.28

-0.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

2.97

-3.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.49

7.86

-9.35

IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMID.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMID.L and UTIL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMID.L drawdown since its inception was -96.27%, which is greater than UTIL.L's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMID.L and UTIL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMID.LUTIL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.27%

-35.43%

-60.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.27%

-8.98%

-87.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.27%

-17.76%

-78.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.27%

-33.85%

-62.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.27%

-35.43%

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.62%

-2.91%

-92.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-8.20%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

63.93%

3.40%

+60.53%

Volatility

IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF (IMID.L) is 3.92%, while SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that IMID.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMID.LUTIL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

5.01%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

321.60%

14.59%

+307.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.96%

17.01%

+79.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.77%

19.14%

+26.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.13%

19.11%

+17.02%

IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMID.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than UTIL.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMID.L nor UTIL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IMID.L and UTIL.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IMID.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IMID.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UTIL.L.

IMID.L is categorized as Global Equities, while UTIL.L is Utilities Equities. IMID.L tracks MSCI ACWI Investable Market Index, while UTIL.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IMID.L and 0.18% for UTIL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMID.L and UTIL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer