IMID.L vs. UTIL.L
IMID.L (SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF) and UTIL.L (SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMID.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Investable Market Index, while UTIL.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMID.L returned -18.50%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for UTIL.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMID.L charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for UTIL.L.
Performance
IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IMID.L is traded in USD, while UTIL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UTIL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMID.L achieves a -95.51% return, which is significantly lower than UTIL.L's 15.29% return. Over the past 10 years, IMID.L has underperformed UTIL.L with an annualized return of -18.50%, while UTIL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.
IMID.L
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- 6M
- -95.56%
- YTD
- -95.51%
- 1Y
- -95.00%
- 3Y*
- -58.96%
- 5Y*
- -41.77%
- 10Y*
- -18.50%
UTIL.L
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMID.L SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF | -95.51% | 22.16% | 16.31% | 21.65% | -17.64% | 17.85% | 16.14% | 25.35% | -9.83% | 22.56% |
UTIL.L SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF | 15.29% | 51.98% | -4.93% | 16.67% | -12.37% | 0.89% | 21.72% | 26.80% | -1.46% | 24.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMID.L and UTIL.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IMID.L and UTIL.L has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMID.L
UTIL.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
IMID.L
UTIL.L
-
Financial Services
IMID.L
UTIL.L
-
Industrials
IMID.L
UTIL.L
Consumer Cyclical
IMID.L
UTIL.L
-
Communication Services
IMID.L
UTIL.L
-
Healthcare
IMID.L
UTIL.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IMID.L
UTIL.L
-
Basic Materials
IMID.L
UTIL.L
-
Energy
IMID.L
UTIL.L
-
Utilities
IMID.L
UTIL.L
Real Estate
IMID.L
UTIL.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMID.L vs. UTIL.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMID.L
UTIL.L
IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF (IMID.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMID.L | UTIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.55 | 1.28 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 2.97 | -3.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 7.86 | -9.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMID.L drawdown since its inception was -96.27%, which is greater than UTIL.L's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMID.L and UTIL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMID.L | UTIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.27% | -35.43% | -60.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.27% | -8.98% | -87.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.27% | -17.76% | -78.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.27% | -33.85% | -62.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.27% | -35.43% | -60.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.62% | -2.91% | -92.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -8.20% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 63.93% | 3.40% | +60.53% |
Volatility
IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF (IMID.L) is 3.92%, while SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that IMID.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMID.L | UTIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 5.01% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 321.60% | 14.59% | +307.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.96% | 17.01% | +79.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.77% | 19.14% | +26.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.13% | 19.11% | +17.02% |
IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMID.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than UTIL.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMID.L vs. UTIL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IMID.L nor UTIL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMID.L and UTIL.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IMID.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IMID.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UTIL.L.
IMID.L is categorized as Global Equities, while UTIL.L is Utilities Equities. IMID.L tracks MSCI ACWI Investable Market Index, while UTIL.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IMID.L and 0.18% for UTIL.L.
Find the right allocation for IMID.L and UTIL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer