IMID.L vs. IQSA.DE
IMID.L (SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI) and IQSA.DE (Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds. IMID.L is passively managed, while IQSA.DE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMID.L returned 10.97%/yr vs 14.39%/yr for IQSA.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IMID.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IQSA.DE.
Performance
IMID.L vs. IQSA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IMID.L is traded in USD, while IQSA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IQSA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMID.L achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly lower than IQSA.DE's 13.54% return.
IMID.L
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 12.31%
- 6M
- 13.92%
- 1Y
- 30.66%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- —
IQSA.DE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 6.29%
- YTD
- 13.54%
- 6M
- 16.85%
- 1Y
- 31.54%
- 3Y*
- 25.50%
- 5Y*
- 14.39%
- 10Y*
- —
IMID.L vs. IQSA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMID.L SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI | 12.31% | 22.16% | 16.31% | 21.65% | -17.64% | 17.85% | 16.14% | 12.93% |
IQSA.DE Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 13.54% | 23.77% | 22.49% | 24.04% | -14.31% | 24.98% | 9.91% | 13.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMID.L and IQSA.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IMID.L and IQSA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMID.L vs. IQSA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IMID.L
IQSA.DE
IMID.L vs. IQSA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L) and Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMID.L | IQSA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.44 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 3.66 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.47 | 15.71 | -1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMID.L | IQSA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.45 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.88 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.92 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
IMID.L vs. IQSA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMID.L drawdown since its inception was -39.56%, which is greater than IQSA.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMID.L and IQSA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMID.L | IQSA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.56% | -34.80% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -8.57% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.21% | -17.81% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.07% | -25.61% | -0.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -0.48% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -4.93% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 2.00% | +0.11% |
Volatility
IMID.L vs. IQSA.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L) and Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.DE) have volatilities of 4.04% and 4.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMID.L | IQSA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 4.09% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 9.89% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 12.83% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 16.11% | -0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 17.87% | +3.36% |
IMID.L vs. IQSA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMID.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IQSA.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMID.L vs. IQSA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IMID.L nor IQSA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMID.L and IQSA.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQSA.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQSA.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IMID.L.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IMID.L and 0.30% for IQSA.DE.
Find the right allocation for IMID.L and IQSA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer