IMID.L vs. ENGY.L

Last updated Jul 26, 2026

IMID.L (SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF) and ENGY.L (SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMID.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Investable Market Index, while ENGY.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMID.L returned -18.83%/yr vs 11.13%/yr for ENGY.L. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IMID.L charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ENGY.L.

Performance

IMID.L vs. ENGY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF (IMID.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IMID.L is traded in USD, while ENGY.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENGY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMID.L achieves a -95.58% return, which is significantly lower than ENGY.L's 33.64% return. Over the past 10 years, IMID.L has underperformed ENGY.L with an annualized return of -18.83%, while ENGY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.13% annualized return.

IMID.L

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.23%
• 6M: -95.68%
• YTD: -95.58%
• 1Y: -95.17%
• 3Y*: -59.68%
• 5Y*: -42.03%
• 10Y*: -18.83%
• ALL TIME*: -10.93%

ENGY.L

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 15.66%
• 6M: 29.18%
• YTD: 33.64%
• 1Y: 44.58%
• 3Y*: 17.90%
• 5Y*: 21.30%
• 10Y*: 11.13%
• ALL TIME*: 9.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ENGY.L SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF	$845.09K	$815.48K	$2.48M
IMID.L SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF	$4.76M	$3.66M	$3.26M

IMID.L vs. ENGY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMID.L SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF	-95.58%	22.16%	16.31%	21.65%	-17.64%	17.85%	16.14%	25.35%	-9.83%	22.56%
ENGY.L SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF	33.64%	29.30%	-10.61%	11.36%	30.50%	26.52%	-25.30%	6.94%	-4.42%	20.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IMID.L and ENGY.L is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2014	0.45

The correlation between IMID.L and ENGY.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IMID.L vs. ENGY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMID.L	ENGY.L
Technology	31.1%	0.1%
Financial Services	15.6%	0.2%
Industrials	12.1%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	0.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	0.1%
Communication Services	7.5%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	0.1%
Basic Materials	3.9%	0.1%
Energy	3.6%	98.6%
Utilities	2.4%	0.0%
Real Estate	2.2%	0.0%

Return for Risk

IMID.L vs. ENGY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMID.L

IMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 2
IMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
IMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 0
IMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
IMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1

ENGY.L

ENGY.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
ENGY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ENGY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ENGY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
ENGY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ENGY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMID.L vs. ENGY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF (IMID.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMID.L	ENGY.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	1.87	-2.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.80	2.37	-3.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.54	1.32	-0.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	2.31	-3.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	7.67	-9.07

IMID.L vs. ENGY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMID.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the ENGY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMID.L and ENGY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMID.L vs. ENGY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMID.L drawdown since its inception was -96.27%, which is greater than ENGY.L's maximum drawdown of -61.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMID.L and ENGY.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMID.L	ENGY.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.27%	-61.34%	-34.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.27%	-19.08%	-77.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.27%	-24.38%	-71.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.27%	-24.41%	-71.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.27%	-61.34%	-34.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.70%	-5.55%	-90.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.03%	-12.17%	+4.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	67.79%	5.76%	+62.03%

Volatility

IMID.L vs. ENGY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF (IMID.L) is 3.48%, while SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that IMID.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENGY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMID.L	ENGY.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	6.54%	-3.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	321.59%	20.40%	+301.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	96.79%	23.62%	+73.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.75%	25.07%	+20.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.12%	26.95%	+9.17%

IMID.L vs. ENGY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMID.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than ENGY.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IMID.L vs. ENGY.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMID.L nor ENGY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMID.L and ENGY.L in my portfolio?

IMID.L and ENGY.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IMID.L or ENGY.L?

On fees, IMID.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMID.L or ENGY.L?

IMID.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ENGY.L.

What is the main difference between IMID.L and ENGY.L?

IMID.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ENGY.L is Energy Equities. IMID.L tracks MSCI ACWI Investable Market Index, while ENGY.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IMID.L and 0.18% for ENGY.L.