IMFL vs. FYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD).
IMFL and FYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2021. FYLD is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Dec 3, 2013.
Performance
IMFL vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMFL vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 7.24% | 30.89% | -3.57% | 25.51% | -17.32% | 6.94% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 15.22% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 6.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMFL achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 15.22% return.
IMFL
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- -8.04%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 16.45%
- 1Y
- 33.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- —
FYLD
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- 15.22%
- 6M
- 21.63%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMFL vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMFL has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IMFL vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank
IMFL
FYLD
IMFL vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMFL | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 2.76 | -0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.61 | 3.43 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.60 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 3.33 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.54 | 19.47 | -8.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMFL | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 2.76 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.75 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.44 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMFL and FYLD is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IMFL vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison
IMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than FYLD's 3.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 3.15% | 2.88% | 3.56% | 3.85% | 3.35% | 3.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.75% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
Drawdowns
IMFL vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, smaller than the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMFL and FYLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMFL | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.26% | -44.55% | +11.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -13.37% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.26% | -25.12% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.70% | -1.69% | -7.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -8.94% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.29% | +0.71% |
Volatility
IMFL vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) at 5.30%. This indicates that IMFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMFL | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.94% | 5.30% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 9.11% | +2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 16.41% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 16.31% | -0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 18.09% | -2.23% |