IMFL vs. FYLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IMFL (Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) are both Global Equities funds. IMFL is passively managed, while FYLD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMFL returned 8.35%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for FYLD. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMFL charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FYLD.

Performance

IMFL vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMFL achieves a 14.49% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 16.00% return.

IMFL

• 1D: -2.84%
• 1M: -0.86%
• YTD: 14.49%
• 6M: 14.56%
• 1Y: 29.53%
• 3Y*: 16.29%
• 5Y*: 8.35%
• 10Y*: —

FYLD

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: -2.27%
• YTD: 16.00%
• 6M: 16.03%
• 1Y: 35.30%
• 3Y*: 21.72%
• 5Y*: 11.36%
• 10Y*: 11.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMFL vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	14.49%	30.89%	-3.57%	25.51%	-17.32%	7.00%
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	16.00%	34.53%	3.00%	13.18%	-5.53%	6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IMFL and FYLD is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021	0.79

The correlation between IMFL and FYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IMFL vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMFL	FYLD
Technology	17.6%	3.5%
Industrials	17.2%	16.2%
Healthcare	11.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	11.3%	5.5%
Financial Services	10.9%	20.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	8.6%
Basic Materials	5.3%	9.5%
Energy	5.3%	29.3%
Utilities	3.7%	1.6%
Communication Services	3.3%	3.8%
Real Estate	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

IMFL vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMFL

IMFL Risk / Return Rank: 55
IMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
IMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
IMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
IMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
IMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 54

FYLD

FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 91
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMFL vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMFL	FYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	2.95	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	4.04	-1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.52	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	6.52	-4.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.82	22.40	-13.58

IMFL vs. FYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the FYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMFL and FYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMFL vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, smaller than the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMFL and FYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMFL	FYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.26%	-44.55%	+11.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.77%	-5.44%	-6.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.52%	-15.15%	+1.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.26%	-25.12%	-8.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.35%	-3.62%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.19%	-8.80%	+1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	1.58%	+1.78%

Volatility

IMFL vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) at 4.20%. This indicates that IMFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMFL	FYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.64%	4.20%	+2.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.32%	9.44%	+4.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.75%	12.04%	+4.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	16.26%	-0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.13%	17.83%	-1.70%

IMFL vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMFL has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMFL vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison

IMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than FYLD's 3.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	3.47%	4.07%	5.41%	6.06%	6.13%	4.74%	3.94%	3.73%	5.17%	2.85%	2.72%	3.98%
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	2.96%	2.88%	3.56%	3.85%	3.35%	3.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMFL and FYLD in my portfolio?

IMFL and FYLD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMFL or FYLD?

IMFL has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to FYLD (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMFL dropped -33.26% vs FYLD's -44.55%.

Which ETF is better, IMFL or FYLD?

On 5-year performance, FYLD leads with 11.36% vs 8.35% for IMFL. On fees, IMFL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMFL or FYLD?

Over the 5-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 11.36% return vs 8.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMFL or FYLD?

IMFL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMFL or FYLD?

FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 2.96% for IMFL.

What is the main difference between IMFL and FYLD?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for IMFL and 0.59% for FYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.