PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMF vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IMF vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IMF vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMF achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.26% return.


IMF

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.05%
YTD
10.34%
6M
15.16%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPHD

1D
-0.36%
1M
-5.48%
YTD
4.26%
6M
1.88%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
9.85%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
7.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IMF vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IMF vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMF
IMF Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMF Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMF Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMF vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMFSPHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

0.23

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.58

0.42

+0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.05

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

0.25

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.49

0.80

-0.31

IMF vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMF and SPHD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMFSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

0.23

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.58

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between IMF and SPHD is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IMF vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

IMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than SPHD's 4.32% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMF
Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
0.92%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.32%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Drawdowns

IMF vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMF drawdown since its inception was -15.10%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMF and SPHD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IMFSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.10%

-41.39%

+26.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.17%

-11.33%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-5.48%

+5.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.72%

-4.70%

-5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.38%

3.53%

+4.85%

Volatility

IMF vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 3.15%. This indicates that IMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IMFSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

3.15%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

7.86%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.21%

14.46%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.10%

14.20%

-1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.10%

17.65%

-4.55%