IMAR vs. DIVN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IMAR (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March) and DIVN (Horizon Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMAR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while DIVN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Horizon. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IMAR returned 10.28% vs 22.54% for DIVN. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IMAR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for DIVN.

Performance

IMAR vs. DIVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMAR achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than DIVN's 14.80% return.

IMAR

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.67%
• 6M: 1.84%
• YTD: 3.05%
• 1Y: 10.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.51%

DIVN

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.14%
• 6M: 8.07%
• YTD: 14.80%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DIVN Horizon Dividend Income ETF	$10.90M	$5.41M	$2.61M
IMAR Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March	$556.22K	$433.12K	$4.08M

IMAR vs. DIVN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IMAR Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March	3.05%	7.10%
DIVN Horizon Dividend Income ETF	14.80%	8.11%

Correlation

The correlation between IMAR and DIVN is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.50

The correlation between IMAR and DIVN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IMAR vs. DIVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMAR

IMAR Risk / Return Rank: 49
IMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
IMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 58
IMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
IMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

DIVN

DIVN Risk / Return Rank: 88
DIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
DIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
DIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMAR vs. DIVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMAR	DIVN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	2.19	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	3.36	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.39	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	4.08	-2.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.74	11.49	-5.75

IMAR vs. DIVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the DIVN Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMAR and DIVN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMAR vs. DIVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.05%, which is greater than DIVN's maximum drawdown of -5.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAR and DIVN.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMAR	DIVN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.05%	-5.55%	-3.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.91%	-5.55%	-1.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-1.39%	+1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.81%	-1.35%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	1.97%	-0.18%

Volatility

IMAR vs. DIVN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) is 2.52%, while Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that IMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMAR	DIVN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	3.15%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.72%	7.55%	+0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.47%	10.52%	-2.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.33%	10.53%	-1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.33%	10.53%	-1.20%

IMAR vs. DIVN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVN's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMAR vs. DIVN - Dividend Comparison

IMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%.

Position	TTM	2025
DIVN Horizon Dividend Income ETF	3.70%	1.47%
IMAR Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMAR and DIVN in my portfolio?

IMAR and DIVN have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMAR or DIVN?

DIVN has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to IMAR (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMAR dropped -9.05% vs DIVN's -5.55%.

Which ETF is better, IMAR or DIVN?

On 1-year performance, DIVN leads with 22.54% vs 10.28% for IMAR. On fees, DIVN is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, IMAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMAR or DIVN?

Over the 1-year period, DIVN has performed better with a 22.54% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMAR or DIVN?

DIVN is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMAR or DIVN?

DIVN has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 0.00% for IMAR.

What is the main difference between IMAR and DIVN?

IMAR is categorized as Options Trading, while DIVN is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IMAR and 0.70% for DIVN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.