ILMBX vs. IMCDX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ILMBX (Voya Limited Maturity Bond Portfolio) and IMCDX (Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund) are both mutual funds - ILMBX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Voya, while IMCDX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Voya. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ILMBX charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IMCDX.

Performance

ILMBX vs. IMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Limited Maturity Bond Portfolio (ILMBX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ILMBX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 0.45%
• 6M: 0.82%
• 1Y: 2.88%
• 3Y*: 4.16%
• 5Y*: 1.49%
• 10Y*: 1.69%

IMCDX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILMBX vs. IMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ILMBX Voya Limited Maturity Bond Portfolio	0.45%	4.30%	4.48%	4.20%	-5.30%	-0.48%	3.20%	4.06%	1.06%	1.20%
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.44%	8.51%	-13.79%	0.08%	8.35%	13.65%	-1.77%	9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ILMBX and IMCDX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2012	0.29

The correlation between ILMBX and IMCDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.41 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ILMBX vs. IMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILMBX

ILMBX Risk / Return Rank: 38
ILMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
ILMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
ILMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ILMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ILMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

IMCDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILMBX vs. IMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Limited Maturity Bond Portfolio (ILMBX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ILMBX	IMCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.23	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ILMBX	IMCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-7.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.16%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.33%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ILMBX	IMCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.91%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.39%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.98%	—	—

ILMBX vs. IMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILMBX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCDX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

ILMBX vs. IMCDX - Dividend Comparison

ILMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, while IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILMBX Voya Limited Maturity Bond Portfolio	3.49%	3.15%	4.26%	3.45%	1.30%	1.09%	1.96%	1.59%	1.45%	1.70%	2.40%	0.95%
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	4.08%	4.21%	3.80%	6.14%	4.64%	4.99%	5.30%	4.79%	5.22%	5.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ILMBX and IMCDX in my portfolio?

ILMBX and IMCDX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.