PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILIT vs. VOLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILIT vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILIT achieves a -5.59% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 32.10% return.


ILIT

1D
-3.92%
1M
-25.26%
6M
-19.17%
YTD
-5.59%
1Y
75.05%
3Y*
-14.39%
5Y*
10Y*

VOLT

1D
-1.75%
1M
-3.09%
6M
26.66%
YTD
32.10%
1Y
49.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILIT vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ILIT
Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF
-5.59%81.51%-14.38%
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
32.10%25.92%-8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ILIT and VOLT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024

0.37

ILIT vs. VOLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILIT
VOLT

Basic Materials

85.0%
1.4%

Industrials

10.8%
42.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
2.3%

Technology

0.4%
12.8%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

5.0%

Financial Services

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

34.8%

Basic Materials

ILIT
85.0%
VOLT
1.4%

Industrials

ILIT
10.8%
VOLT
42.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ILIT
3.7%
VOLT
2.3%

Technology

ILIT
0.4%
VOLT
12.8%

Communication Services

ILIT

-

VOLT

-

Consumer Defensive

ILIT

-

VOLT

-

Energy

ILIT

-

VOLT
5.0%

Financial Services

ILIT

-

VOLT
0.5%

Healthcare

ILIT

-

VOLT

-

Real Estate

ILIT

-

VOLT

-

Utilities

ILIT

-

VOLT
34.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILIT vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILIT
ILIT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ILIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ILIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VOLT
VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILIT vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ILITVOLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

5.19

-3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.41

13.50

-7.09

ILIT vs. VOLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the VOLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILIT and VOLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILIT vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILIT drawdown since its inception was -73.69%, which is greater than VOLT's maximum drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILIT and VOLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILITVOLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.69%

-23.40%

-50.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.91%

-9.59%

-28.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.24%

-9.13%

-29.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-5.15%

-39.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.74%

3.68%

+8.06%

Volatility

ILIT vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) has a higher volatility of 14.66% compared to Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) at 10.62%. This indicates that ILIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILITVOLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.66%

10.62%

+4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.14%

19.71%

+15.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.96%

23.10%

+27.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.05%

24.98%

+17.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.05%

24.98%

+17.07%

ILIT vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILIT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ILIT vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison

ILIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than VOLT's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ILIT
Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF
2.18%2.27%6.48%0.69%
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
0.35%0.46%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ILIT and VOLT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILIT has higher volatility (14.66%) compared to VOLT (10.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILIT dropped -73.69% vs VOLT's -23.40%.

On 1-year performance, ILIT leads with 75.05% vs 49.57% for VOLT. On fees, ILIT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, VOLT has been the lower-risk option at 10.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ILIT has performed better with a 75.05% return vs 49.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILIT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.

ILIT has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 0.35% for VOLT.

ILIT is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while VOLT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ILIT and 0.75% for VOLT.

VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILIT and VOLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer