PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ILIT vs. CRAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ILIT vs. CRAK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ILIT (Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - ILIT tracks the STOXX Global Lithium Miners and Producers Index - USD - Benchmark TR Net while CRAK tracks the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ILIT returned 181.76% vs 67.58% for CRAK. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ILIT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.

Performance

ILIT vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILIT achieves a 25.82% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 33.23% return.

ILIT

1D
-3.77%
1M
-12.04%
YTD
25.82%
6M
35.19%
1Y
181.76%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

CRAK

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
33.23%
6M
27.96%
1Y
67.58%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
13.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILIT vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
ILIT
Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF		25.82%81.51%-45.14%-28.86%
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF		33.23%39.11%-15.05%18.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ILIT and CRAK is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023

0.34

The correlation between ILIT and CRAK shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ILIT vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ILIT
CRAK

Basic Materials

81.9%
1.1%

Industrials

6.4%
4.0%

Technology

4.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

98.9%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

ILIT
81.9%
CRAK
1.1%

Industrials

ILIT
6.4%
CRAK
4.0%

Technology

ILIT
4.9%
CRAK

-

Consumer Cyclical

ILIT
3.8%
CRAK

-

Communication Services

ILIT

-

CRAK

-

Consumer Defensive

ILIT

-

CRAK

-

Energy

ILIT

-

CRAK
98.9%

Financial Services

ILIT

-

CRAK

-

Healthcare

ILIT

-

CRAK

-

Real Estate

ILIT

-

CRAK

-

Utilities

ILIT

-

CRAK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF

VanEck Oil Refiners ETF

Often compared with ILIT:
ILIT vs. LITILIT vs. LITPILIT vs. HLITILIT vs. BATTILIT vs. EPUILIT vs. VOOILIT vs. ALB
Often compared with CRAK:
CRAK vs. XLECRAK vs. OIHCRAK vs. VDECRAK vs. IEOCRAK vs. USAICRAK vs. AMLPCRAK vs. SCHD

Return for Risk

ILIT vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ILIT
ILIT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ILIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILIT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ILIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
CRAK
CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILIT vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ILITCRAKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.74
3.70

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.84
4.76

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.62

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.00

7.93

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.21

22.48

-0.27

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ILIT vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILIT Sharpe Ratio is 3.74, which is comparable to the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILIT and CRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ILITCRAKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74

3.70

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.66

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.60

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.54

-0.63

Drawdowns

ILIT vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILIT drawdown since its inception was -73.69%, which is greater than CRAK's maximum drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILIT and CRAK.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ILITCRAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.69%

-58.80%

-14.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.86%

-8.57%

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-35.61%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-35.61%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-58.80%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.69%

-3.81%

-13.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.87%

-12.50%

-33.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.22%

3.02%

+5.20%

Volatility

ILIT vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) has a higher volatility of 11.95% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 6.74%. This indicates that ILIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ILITCRAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.95%

6.74%

+5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.28%

14.27%

+19.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.97%

18.35%

+30.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.58%

20.61%

+20.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.58%

22.16%

+19.42%

ILIT vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILIT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

ILIT vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

ILIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than CRAK's 1.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF		1.51%2.02%5.60%3.65%3.08%2.40%2.64%1.49%2.42%1.66%3.42%0.47%
ILIT
Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF		1.81%2.27%6.48%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ILIT and CRAK have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILIT has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to CRAK (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILIT dropped -73.69% vs CRAK's -58.80%.

On 1-year performance, ILIT leads with 181.76% vs 67.58% for CRAK. On fees, ILIT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ILIT has performed better with a 181.76% return vs 67.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILIT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for CRAK.

ILIT has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.51% for CRAK.

ILIT tracks STOXX Global Lithium Miners and Producers Index - USD - Benchmark TR Net, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ILIT and 0.62% for CRAK.

ILIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 3.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILIT and CRAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer