PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILIT vs. BKGI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILIT vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILIT achieves a 25.82% return, which is significantly higher than BKGI's 12.20% return.


ILIT

1D
-3.77%
1M
-12.04%
YTD
25.82%
6M
35.19%
1Y
181.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BKGI

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.13%
YTD
12.20%
6M
12.27%
1Y
21.78%
3Y*
22.14%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILIT vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ILIT
Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF
25.82%81.51%-45.14%-28.86%
BKGI
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
12.20%37.53%12.35%4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ILIT and BKGI is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023

0.28

ILIT vs. BKGI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILIT
BKGI

Basic Materials

81.9%

-

Industrials

6.4%
14.0%

Technology

4.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%

-

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

21.6%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

11.5%

Utilities

-

49.3%

Basic Materials

ILIT
81.9%
BKGI

-

Industrials

ILIT
6.4%
BKGI
14.0%

Technology

ILIT
4.9%
BKGI

-

Consumer Cyclical

ILIT
3.8%
BKGI

-

Communication Services

ILIT

-

BKGI
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

ILIT

-

BKGI

-

Energy

ILIT

-

BKGI
21.6%

Financial Services

ILIT

-

BKGI

-

Healthcare

ILIT

-

BKGI

-

Real Estate

ILIT

-

BKGI
11.5%

Utilities

ILIT

-

BKGI
49.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILIT vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILIT
ILIT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ILIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILIT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ILIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

BKGI
BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILIT vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ILITBKGIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.74

1.89

+1.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.84

2.63

+1.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.34

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.00

3.55

+4.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.21

11.67

+10.54

ILIT vs. BKGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILIT Sharpe Ratio is 3.74, which is higher than the BKGI Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILIT and BKGI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ILITBKGIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74

1.89

+1.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

1.61

-1.70

Drawdowns

ILIT vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILIT drawdown since its inception was -73.69%, which is greater than BKGI's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILIT and BKGI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILITBKGIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.69%

-14.79%

-58.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.86%

-6.16%

-16.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.69%

-3.14%

-14.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.87%

-2.57%

-43.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.22%

1.87%

+6.35%

Volatility

ILIT vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) has a higher volatility of 11.95% compared to Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) at 4.17%. This indicates that ILIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILITBKGIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.95%

4.17%

+7.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.28%

9.04%

+24.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.97%

11.59%

+37.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.58%

14.07%

+27.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.58%

14.07%

+27.51%

ILIT vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILIT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ILIT vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison

ILIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than BKGI's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BKGI
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
2.69%2.65%4.55%4.55%0.53%
ILIT
Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF
1.81%2.27%6.48%0.69%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ILIT and BKGI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILIT has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to BKGI (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILIT dropped -73.69% vs BKGI's -14.79%.

On 1-year performance, ILIT leads with 181.76% vs 21.78% for BKGI. On fees, ILIT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, BKGI has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ILIT has performed better with a 181.76% return vs 21.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILIT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKGI.

BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.81% for ILIT.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ILIT and 0.65% for BKGI.

ILIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILIT and BKGI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer