PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILCV vs. XMAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILCV vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCV achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than XMAG's 12.73% return.


ILCV

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.76%
YTD
7.75%
6M
7.41%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
11.68%

XMAG

1D
0.01%
1M
6.69%
YTD
12.73%
6M
13.28%
1Y
24.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILCV vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
7.75%18.79%-1.79%
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
12.73%15.63%-1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCV and XMAG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024

0.90

The correlation between ILCV and XMAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ILCV vs. XMAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILCV
XMAG

Technology

23.8%
25.3%

Financial Services

16.5%
17.3%

Healthcare

11.5%
13.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
6.2%

Industrials

8.8%
12.6%

Communication Services

8.0%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
7.3%

Energy

6.0%
5.5%

Utilities

3.5%
3.4%

Basic Materials

2.4%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.9%

Technology

ILCV
23.8%
XMAG
25.3%

Financial Services

ILCV
16.5%
XMAG
17.3%

Healthcare

ILCV
11.5%
XMAG
13.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ILCV
9.5%
XMAG
6.2%

Industrials

ILCV
8.8%
XMAG
12.6%

Communication Services

ILCV
8.0%
XMAG
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

ILCV
7.6%
XMAG
7.3%

Energy

ILCV
6.0%
XMAG
5.5%

Utilities

ILCV
3.5%
XMAG
3.4%

Basic Materials

ILCV
2.4%
XMAG
2.5%

Real Estate

ILCV
2.0%
XMAG
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILCV vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

XMAG
XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILCV vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ILCVXMAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.39

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

3.39

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.87

15.15

+1.72

ILCV vs. XMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the XMAG Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCV and XMAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ILCVXMAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

2.23

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

1.11

-0.65

Drawdowns

ILCV vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and XMAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILCVXMAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.63%

-16.17%

-42.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-7.29%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

0.00%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-2.13%

-7.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.63%

-0.05%

Volatility

ILCV vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) is 2.01%, while Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that ILCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILCVXMAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

2.87%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.97%

8.65%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

11.10%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

15.12%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.66%

15.12%

+1.54%

ILCV vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ILCV vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison

ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than XMAG's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.63%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
0.46%0.51%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ILCV and XMAG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMAG has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to ILCV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCV dropped -58.63% vs XMAG's -16.17%.

On 1-year performance, ILCV leads with 26.58% vs 24.62% for XMAG. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 26.58% return vs 24.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMAG.

ILCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.46% for XMAG.

ILCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while XMAG tracks BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCV and 0.35% for XMAG.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILCV and XMAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer