ILCV vs. XMAG
ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) and XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while XMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ILCV returned 26.58% vs 24.62% for XMAG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ILCV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMAG.
Performance
ILCV vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCV achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than XMAG's 12.73% return.
ILCV
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- 1Y
- 26.58%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.68%
XMAG
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 24.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCV vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 7.75% | 18.79% | -1.79% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 12.73% | 15.63% | -1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCV and XMAG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between ILCV and XMAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
ILCV vs. XMAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCV
XMAG
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
ILCV
XMAG
Financial Services
ILCV
XMAG
Healthcare
ILCV
XMAG
Consumer Cyclical
ILCV
XMAG
Industrials
ILCV
XMAG
Communication Services
ILCV
XMAG
Consumer Defensive
ILCV
XMAG
Energy
ILCV
XMAG
Utilities
ILCV
XMAG
Basic Materials
ILCV
XMAG
Real Estate
ILCV
XMAG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCV vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank
ILCV
XMAG
ILCV vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILCV | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.39 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 3.39 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.87 | 15.15 | +1.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILCV | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 2.23 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.11 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
ILCV vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and XMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCV | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -16.17% | -42.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -7.29% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | 0.00% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -2.13% | -7.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 1.63% | -0.05% |
Volatility
ILCV vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) is 2.01%, while Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that ILCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCV | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.01% | 2.87% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.97% | 8.65% | -1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.82% | 11.10% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 15.12% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 15.12% | +1.54% |
ILCV vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ILCV vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison
ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than XMAG's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.93% | 2.32% | 2.76% | 3.01% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 0.46% | 0.51% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILCV and XMAG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMAG has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to ILCV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCV dropped -58.63% vs XMAG's -16.17%.
On 1-year performance, ILCV leads with 26.58% vs 24.62% for XMAG. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 26.58% return vs 24.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMAG.
ILCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.46% for XMAG.
ILCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while XMAG tracks BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCV and 0.35% for XMAG.
ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCV and XMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer