ILCV vs. VMAX
ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) and VMAX (Hartford US Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. ILCV is passively managed, while VMAX is actively managed. Over the past year, ILCV returned 29.26% vs 30.41% for VMAX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ILCV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VMAX.
Performance
ILCV vs. VMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCV achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than VMAX's 18.06% return.
ILCV
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.73%
VMAX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- YTD
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 30.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.89M | $2.26M | $2.59M | |
| $14.79K | $8.89K | $5.90K |
ILCV vs. VMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 12.42% | 18.79% | 17.03% | 5.38% |
VMAX Hartford US Value ETF | 18.06% | 15.65% | 15.89% | 5.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCV and VMAX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between ILCV and VMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
ILCV vs. VMAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCV
VMAX
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
ILCV
VMAX
Financial Services
ILCV
VMAX
Healthcare
ILCV
VMAX
Communication Services
ILCV
VMAX
Consumer Cyclical
ILCV
VMAX
Consumer Defensive
ILCV
VMAX
Industrials
ILCV
VMAX
Energy
ILCV
VMAX
Utilities
ILCV
VMAX
Basic Materials
ILCV
VMAX
Real Estate
ILCV
VMAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCV vs. VMAX — Risk / Return Rank
ILCV
VMAX
ILCV vs. VMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILCV | VMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.42 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 5.82 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.65 | 21.45 | -3.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILCV vs. VMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than VMAX's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and VMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCV | VMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -19.05% | -39.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -4.93% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.34% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -2.43% | -6.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 1.34% | +0.22% |
Volatility
ILCV vs. VMAX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) at 2.47%. This indicates that ILCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCV | VMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 2.47% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 8.32% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.09% | 12.08% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 15.18% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 15.18% | +1.45% |
ILCV vs. VMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VMAX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ILCV vs. VMAX - Dividend Comparison
ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than VMAX's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 1.55% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.93% | 2.32% | 2.76% | 3.01% |
VMAX Hartford US Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.14% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILCV and VMAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILCV has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to VMAX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCV dropped -58.63% vs VMAX's -19.05%.
On 1-year performance, VMAX leads with 30.41% vs 29.26% for ILCV. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VMAX has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VMAX has performed better with a 30.41% return vs 29.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VMAX.
VMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.55% for ILCV.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCV and 0.29% for VMAX.
ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCV and VMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer