PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILCV vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILCV vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCV achieves a 14.55% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 13.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCV has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 11.95%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.


ILCV

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.58%
6M
10.71%
YTD
14.55%
1Y
30.45%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*
11.95%
ALL TIME*
8.81%

IVV

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.46%
6M
12.80%
YTD
13.51%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
21.48%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
15.32%
ALL TIME*
8.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.88M$2.23M$2.51M
$3.47B$3.27B$5.84B

ILCV vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
14.55%18.79%17.03%14.43%-7.02%26.71%-0.84%25.19%-6.24%15.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
13.51%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCV and IVV is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004

0.89

The correlation between ILCV and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ILCV vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILCV
IVV

Technology

22.6%
37.2%

Financial Services

18.3%
12.5%

Healthcare

12.6%
9.4%

Communication Services

9.9%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
4.8%

Industrials

6.8%
7.9%

Energy

5.5%
3.3%

Utilities

3.4%
2.6%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Technology

ILCV
22.6%
IVV
37.2%

Financial Services

ILCV
18.3%
IVV
12.5%

Healthcare

ILCV
12.6%
IVV
9.4%

Communication Services

ILCV
9.9%
IVV
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ILCV
9.6%
IVV
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

ILCV
7.3%
IVV
4.8%

Industrials

ILCV
6.8%
IVV
7.9%

Energy

ILCV
5.5%
IVV
3.3%

Utilities

ILCV
3.4%
IVV
2.6%

Basic Materials

ILCV
2.1%
IVV
1.8%

Real Estate

ILCV
1.9%
IVV
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILCV vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ILCV vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ILCVIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.34

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

2.71

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.55

11.55

+7.99

ILCV vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCV Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCV and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILCV vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILCVIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.63%

-55.25%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-8.89%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-18.75%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

-24.53%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.53%

-33.90%

-1.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.18%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-10.72%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

2.08%

-0.52%

Volatility

ILCV vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) is 3.06%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that ILCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILCVIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

4.06%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.43%

10.35%

-2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.98%

12.88%

-2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

17.04%

-2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

18.08%

-1.45%

ILCV vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ILCV vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.53%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


ILCV and IVV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to ILCV (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCV dropped -58.63% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.32% vs 11.95% for ILCV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.32% return vs 11.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for ILCV.

ILCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

ILCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCV and 0.03% for IVV.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILCV and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer