PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILCG vs. TSPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILCG vs. TSPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCG achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly lower than TSPA's 9.75% return.


ILCG

1D
-0.10%
1M
-4.00%
6M
7.34%
YTD
8.29%
1Y
14.31%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
17.20%
ALL TIME*
11.57%

TSPA

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.03%
6M
8.25%
YTD
9.75%
1Y
19.66%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
13.44%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILCG vs. TSPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
8.29%16.71%32.82%40.41%-31.75%17.42%
TSPA
T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF
9.75%16.44%26.37%29.95%-18.70%13.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCG and TSPA is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021

0.95

The correlation between ILCG and TSPA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

ILCG vs. TSPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILCG
TSPA

Technology

54.1%
35.9%

Industrials

10.9%
8.0%

Communication Services

9.7%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
10.0%

Healthcare

5.3%
8.6%

Financial Services

4.7%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
4.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.4%
1.8%

Utilities

0.9%
2.4%

Energy

0.7%
3.6%

Technology

ILCG
54.1%
TSPA
35.9%

Industrials

ILCG
10.9%
TSPA
8.0%

Communication Services

ILCG
9.7%
TSPA
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ILCG
9.2%
TSPA
10.0%

Healthcare

ILCG
5.3%
TSPA
8.6%

Financial Services

ILCG
4.7%
TSPA
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

ILCG
1.6%
TSPA
4.7%

Real Estate

ILCG
1.5%
TSPA
1.7%

Basic Materials

ILCG
1.4%
TSPA
1.8%

Utilities

ILCG
0.9%
TSPA
2.4%

Energy

ILCG
0.7%
TSPA
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILCG vs. TSPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCG
ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

TSPA
TSPA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILCG vs. TSPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ILCGTSPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.27

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.14

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.04

9.38

-6.34

ILCG vs. TSPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCG Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the TSPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCG and TSPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILCG vs. TSPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCG drawdown since its inception was -52.98%, which is greater than TSPA's maximum drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCG and TSPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILCGTSPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.98%

-24.72%

-28.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

-9.24%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.10%

-19.04%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.38%

-24.72%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.38%

-2.07%

-4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-5.40%

-2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

2.10%

+2.61%

Volatility

ILCG vs. TSPA - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) at 3.96%. This indicates that ILCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILCGTSPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

3.96%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

10.71%

+4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.27%

13.24%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.31%

17.10%

+5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.66%

16.98%

+4.68%

ILCG vs. TSPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TSPA's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

ILCG vs. TSPA - Dividend Comparison

ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than TSPA's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.42%0.47%0.50%0.69%0.75%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%
TSPA
T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF
0.57%0.62%0.50%0.41%1.16%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, ILCG and TSPA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ILCG has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to TSPA (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCG dropped -52.98% vs TSPA's -24.72%.

On 5-year performance, TSPA leads with 13.44% vs 11.83% for ILCG. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, TSPA has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TSPA has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for TSPA.

TSPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.

ILCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TSPA is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCG and 0.34% for TSPA.

TSPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILCG and TSPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer