ILCG vs. SWISX
ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) and SWISX (Schwab International Index Fund) are both funds - ILCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross, while SWISX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILCG returned 17.85%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for SWISX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ILCG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SWISX.
Performance
ILCG vs. SWISX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCG achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly higher than SWISX's 8.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCG has outperformed SWISX with an annualized return of 17.85%, while SWISX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.70% annualized return.
ILCG
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 24.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.07%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- 17.85%
SWISX
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 21.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
ILCG vs. SWISX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 9.97% | 16.71% | 32.82% | 40.41% | -31.75% | 24.33% | 38.56% | 33.22% | 2.06% | 30.57% |
SWISX Schwab International Index Fund | 8.95% | 31.59% | 3.54% | 18.13% | -14.30% | 11.25% | 8.14% | 21.87% | -13.38% | 25.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCG and SWISX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004 | 0.72 |
The correlation between ILCG and SWISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ILCG vs. SWISX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCG
SWISX
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
ILCG
SWISX
Communication Services
ILCG
SWISX
Consumer Cyclical
ILCG
SWISX
Industrials
ILCG
SWISX
Financial Services
ILCG
SWISX
Healthcare
ILCG
SWISX
Consumer Defensive
ILCG
SWISX
Real Estate
ILCG
SWISX
Basic Materials
ILCG
SWISX
Utilities
ILCG
SWISX
Energy
ILCG
SWISX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCG vs. SWISX — Risk / Return Rank
ILCG
SWISX
ILCG vs. SWISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILCG | SWISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 1.83 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | 6.82 | -1.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILCG vs. SWISX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCG drawdown since its inception was -52.98%, smaller than the maximum SWISX drawdown of -60.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCG and SWISX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCG | SWISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.98% | -60.65% | +7.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.65% | -11.39% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.10% | -13.68% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.38% | -29.42% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.38% | -33.83% | -1.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.92% | -1.01% | -3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -14.80% | +6.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.51% | 3.05% | +1.46% |
Volatility
ILCG vs. SWISX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) at 5.34%. This indicates that ILCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCG | SWISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.77% | 5.34% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.98% | 13.07% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.16% | 15.74% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.12% | 16.39% | +5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.59% | 16.90% | +4.69% |
ILCG vs. SWISX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SWISX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ILCG vs. SWISX - Dividend Comparison
ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than SWISX's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
SWISX Schwab International Index Fund | 3.26% | 3.55% | 3.29% | 3.31% | 2.73% | 3.34% | 1.88% | 3.09% | 3.15% | 2.71% | 3.19% | 2.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILCG and SWISX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILCG has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to SWISX (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCG dropped -52.98% vs SWISX's -60.65%.
ILCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCG and SWISX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer