ILCG vs. BITI
ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ILCG returned 23.09%/yr vs -32.35%/yr for BITI. Their -0.39 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ILCG charges 0.04%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
ILCG vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 25.22% return.
ILCG
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 16.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.09%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 17.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.61%
BITI
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- 6M
- 13.09%
- YTD
- 25.22%
- 1Y
- 56.28%
- 3Y*
- -32.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -35.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.18M | $25.87M | $38.72M | |
| $5.71M | $6.91M | $9.84M |
ILCG vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 9.70% | 16.71% | 32.82% | 40.41% | 0.35% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 25.22% | -1.76% | -62.60% | -66.17% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCG and BITI is -0.47, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022 | -0.39 |
The correlation between ILCG and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.47 (1 year) to -0.37 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCG vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
ILCG
BITI
ILCG vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILCG | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.22 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 2.24 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 5.45 | -2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILCG vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCG drawdown since its inception was -52.98%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCG and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCG | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.98% | -92.16% | +39.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.65% | -25.28% | +9.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.10% | -84.63% | +61.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -86.33% | +81.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -68.61% | +60.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 10.37% | -5.45% |
Volatility
ILCG vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) is 6.33%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that ILCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCG | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 8.93% | -2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | 33.35% | -17.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.74% | 44.25% | -25.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 52.01% | -29.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 52.01% | -30.30% |
ILCG vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ILCG vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than BITI's 21.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 21.80% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILCG and BITI have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITI has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to ILCG (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCG dropped -52.98% vs BITI's -92.16%.
On 3-year performance, ILCG leads with 23.09% vs -32.35% for BITI. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCG has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 23.09% return vs -32.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 21.80%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.
ILCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCG and 1.03% for BITI.
BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCG and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer