PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IKOR.L vs. AASG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IKOR.L vs. AASG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IKOR.L (iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)) and AASG.L (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IKOR.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD while AASG.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IKOR.L returned 17.90%/yr vs 12.11%/yr for AASG.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IKOR.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AASG.L.

Performance

IKOR.L vs. AASG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IKOR.L achieves a 107.66% return, which is significantly higher than AASG.L's 30.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IKOR.L has outperformed AASG.L with an annualized return of 17.90%, while AASG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.11% annualized return.

IKOR.L

1D
-4.06%
1M
17.39%
YTD
107.66%
6M
126.31%
1Y
237.26%
3Y*
45.36%
5Y*
19.90%
10Y*
17.90%

AASG.L

1D
-1.81%
1M
8.00%
YTD
30.49%
6M
33.01%
1Y
59.28%
3Y*
22.95%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
12.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IKOR.L vs. AASG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IKOR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)		107.66%85.96%-21.55%13.31%-19.76%-7.30%39.09%6.99%-16.57%32.45%
AASG.L
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD		30.49%23.83%14.04%0.69%-11.51%-4.50%24.04%14.10%-10.84%30.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IKOR.L and AASG.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.76

The correlation between IKOR.L and AASG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

IKOR.L vs. AASG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IKOR.L
AASG.L

Technology

56.0%
44.9%

Industrials

18.8%
7.8%

Financial Services

9.2%
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
10.6%

Healthcare

3.0%
3.2%

Communication Services

2.6%
7.1%

Basic Materials

2.0%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
2.5%

Energy

1.1%
2.9%

Utilities

0.4%
1.5%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Technology

IKOR.L
56.0%
AASG.L
44.9%

Industrials

IKOR.L
18.8%
AASG.L
7.8%

Financial Services

IKOR.L
9.2%
AASG.L
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IKOR.L
5.7%
AASG.L
10.6%

Healthcare

IKOR.L
3.0%
AASG.L
3.2%

Communication Services

IKOR.L
2.6%
AASG.L
7.1%

Basic Materials

IKOR.L
2.0%
AASG.L
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

IKOR.L
1.4%
AASG.L
2.5%

Energy

IKOR.L
1.1%
AASG.L
2.9%

Utilities

IKOR.L
0.4%
AASG.L
1.5%

Real Estate

IKOR.L

-

AASG.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)

Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD

Often compared with IKOR.L:
IKOR.L vs. VOOIKOR.L vs. EWYIKOR.L vs. FLRK.LIKOR.L vs. FRXT.LIKOR.L vs. XMID.LIKOR.L vs. CP9U.LIKOR.L vs. CSKR.L
Often compared with AASG.L:
AASG.L vs. TQQQAASG.L vs. HMXJ.LAASG.L vs. MPXG.LAASG.L vs. IAPD.LAASG.L vs. ASDV.LAASG.L vs. XKS2.LAASG.L vs. 500U.L

Return for Risk

IKOR.L vs. AASG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IKOR.L
IKOR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IKOR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
AASG.L
AASG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AASG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AASG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AASG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AASG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AASG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IKOR.L vs. AASG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IKOR.LAASG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
6.36
3.22

+3.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.81
4.11

+1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.83

1.57

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.97

5.15

+5.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

39.06

17.77

+21.29

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IKOR.L vs. AASG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IKOR.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.36, which is higher than the AASG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IKOR.L and AASG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IKOR.LAASG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.36

3.22

+3.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.51

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.66

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.68

-0.26

Drawdowns

IKOR.L vs. AASG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IKOR.L drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, which is greater than AASG.L's maximum drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IKOR.L and AASG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IKOR.LAASG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.70%

-34.12%

-27.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.48%

-11.46%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.58%

-17.56%

-11.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.83%

-28.57%

-12.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.11%

-34.12%

-9.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

-2.74%

-2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.59%

-11.02%

-4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.05%

3.33%

+2.72%

Volatility

IKOR.L vs. AASG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L) has a higher volatility of 17.45% compared to Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) at 8.29%. This indicates that IKOR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AASG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IKOR.LAASG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.45%

8.29%

+9.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.34%

15.55%

+16.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.08%

18.34%

+18.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.31%

17.70%

+7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.76%

18.56%

+6.20%

IKOR.L vs. AASG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IKOR.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than AASG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

IKOR.L vs. AASG.L - Dividend Comparison

IKOR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while AASG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AASG.L
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IKOR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)		0.42%0.83%1.31%1.14%1.34%1.36%0.76%1.28%1.07%0.72%0.57%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

IKOR.L and AASG.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AASG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AASG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IKOR.L.

IKOR.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD, while AASG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IKOR.L and 0.20% for AASG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IKOR.L and AASG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer