IJUN vs. JANB

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

IJUN (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - June) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IJUN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.

Performance

IJUN vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - June (IJUN) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IJUN having a 4.98% return and JANB slightly higher at 5.22%.

IJUN

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: 4.98%
• 6M: 6.48%
• 1Y: 11.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JANB

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 5.22%
• 6M: 6.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJUN vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IJUN Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - June	4.98%	2.90%
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF	5.22%	2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between IJUN and JANB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.76

Return for Risk

IJUN vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJUN

IJUN Risk / Return Rank: 51
IJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
IJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 49
IJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
IJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJUN vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - June (IJUN) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IJUN	JANB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.37	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IJUN	JANB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.16	1.73	-0.57

Drawdowns

IJUN vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJUN drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJUN and JANB.

Drawdown Indicators

	IJUN	JANB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.31%	-6.52%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-1.03%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.71%	-1.13%	-0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IJUN	JANB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.17%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.73%	7.48%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.92%	7.48%	+1.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.92%	7.48%	+1.44%

IJUN vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

IJUN vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

Neither IJUN nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IJUN and JANB in my portfolio?

IJUN and JANB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IJUN or JANB?

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IJUN or JANB?

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IJUN or JANB?

IJUN and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IJUN and JANB?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IJUN and 0.25% for JANB.