PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJUL vs. SFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJUL vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJUL achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly lower than SFLR's 6.20% return.


IJUL

1D
0.20%
1M
2.04%
YTD
5.89%
6M
7.38%
1Y
13.02%
3Y*
11.33%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*

SFLR

1D
0.62%
1M
4.77%
YTD
6.20%
6M
6.35%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJUL vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IJUL
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July
5.89%20.98%2.12%13.77%6.33%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
6.20%13.29%19.99%21.20%1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IJUL and SFLR is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022

0.66

The correlation between IJUL and SFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJUL vs. SFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJUL
SFLR

Financial Services

24.7%
11.3%

Industrials

19.8%
8.4%

Healthcare

10.6%
8.5%

Technology

10.3%
35.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
4.8%

Basic Materials

5.9%
2.1%

Communication Services

4.5%
11.7%

Energy

4.0%
3.7%

Utilities

4.0%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.6%

Financial Services

IJUL
24.7%
SFLR
11.3%

Industrials

IJUL
19.8%
SFLR
8.4%

Healthcare

IJUL
10.6%
SFLR
8.5%

Technology

IJUL
10.3%
SFLR
35.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IJUL
7.7%
SFLR
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

IJUL
6.7%
SFLR
4.8%

Basic Materials

IJUL
5.9%
SFLR
2.1%

Communication Services

IJUL
4.5%
SFLR
11.7%

Energy

IJUL
4.0%
SFLR
3.7%

Utilities

IJUL
4.0%
SFLR
2.5%

Real Estate

IJUL
1.9%
SFLR
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJUL vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJUL
IJUL Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SFLR
SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJUL vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJULSFLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.94

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

12.00

-2.30

IJUL vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the SFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJUL and SFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJULSFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.24

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

1.73

-1.15

Drawdowns

IJUL vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJUL drawdown since its inception was -21.09%, which is greater than SFLR's maximum drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJUL and SFLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJULSFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.09%

-12.13%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.35%

-6.79%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.27%

-12.13%

+3.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-1.74%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

1.66%

-0.31%

Volatility

IJUL vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) have volatilities of 1.85% and 1.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJULSFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

1.77%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.09%

6.49%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.00%

8.91%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.85%

10.15%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.07%

10.15%

+0.92%

IJUL vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJUL vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

IJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IJUL
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.99%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
0.32%0.33%0.42%1.16%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJUL and SFLR have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJUL has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to SFLR (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJUL dropped -21.09% vs SFLR's -12.13%.

On 3-year performance, SFLR leads with 16.25% vs 11.33% for IJUL. On fees, IJUL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 11.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJUL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.

SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for IJUL.

IJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SFLR is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IJUL and 0.89% for SFLR.

SFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJUL and SFLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer