PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJR vs. XLB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJR vs. XLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IJR is traded in USD, while XLB.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XLB.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJR achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than XLB.TO's 0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, IJR has outperformed XLB.TO with an annualized return of 11.16%, while XLB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -0.14% annualized return.


IJR

1D
0.97%
1M
6.20%
YTD
19.73%
6M
16.47%
1Y
34.35%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
11.16%

XLB.TO

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
0.25%
6M
1.39%
1Y
1.01%
3Y*
1.86%
5Y*
-4.59%
10Y*
-0.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJR vs. XLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
19.73%5.89%8.63%16.06%-16.20%26.58%11.28%22.82%-8.51%13.15%
XLB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF
0.25%3.99%-7.15%11.81%-26.31%-4.54%13.88%17.71%-7.99%14.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IJR and XLB.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2006

-0.02

The correlation between IJR and XLB.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJR vs. XLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJR
IJR Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

XLB.TO
XLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJR vs. XLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJRXLB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.03

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

0.18

+3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

0.38

+12.97

IJR vs. XLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the XLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJR and XLB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJR vs. XLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJR drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, which is greater than XLB.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJR and XLB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJRXLB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.15%

-36.38%

-21.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-5.76%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.02%

-14.63%

-13.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

-34.20%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.36%

-36.38%

-7.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-24.01%

+24.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.27%

-11.09%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.63%

-0.04%

Volatility

IJR vs. XLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) at 3.13%. This indicates that IJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJRXLB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

3.13%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.97%

6.88%

+5.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.76%

8.96%

+8.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.43%

13.88%

+7.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.92%

13.36%

+9.56%

IJR vs. XLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than XLB.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJR vs. XLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than XLB.TO's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
1.11%1.44%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.22%1.48%
XLB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF
4.02%4.05%3.82%3.73%3.97%3.03%2.90%3.18%3.56%3.45%3.62%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJR and XLB.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLB.TO.

IJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XLB.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while XLB.TO tracks Morningstar Can 10+Y Core Bd GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IJR and 0.20% for XLB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJR and XLB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer