IJR vs. HYG
IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) and HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJR returned 10.76%/yr vs 4.97%/yr for HYG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IJR charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HYG.
Performance
IJR vs. HYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJR achieves a 16.42% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, IJR has outperformed HYG with an annualized return of 10.76%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.97% annualized return.
IJR
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 16.42%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 34.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
HYG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.97%
IJR vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 16.42% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 16.06% | -16.20% | 26.58% | 11.28% | 22.82% | -8.51% | 13.15% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.60% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJR and HYG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2007 | 0.60 |
The correlation between IJR and HYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJR vs. HYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJR
HYG
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Financial Services
IJR
HYG
-
Industrials
IJR
HYG
-
Technology
IJR
HYG
-
Consumer Cyclical
IJR
HYG
-
Healthcare
IJR
HYG
-
Real Estate
IJR
HYG
Energy
IJR
HYG
-
Basic Materials
IJR
HYG
-
Communication Services
IJR
HYG
-
Consumer Defensive
IJR
HYG
-
Utilities
IJR
HYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJR vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank
IJR
HYG
IJR vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJR | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 1.85 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | 2.80 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 2.99 | +0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.21 | 13.22 | -0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJR | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 1.85 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.52 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.60 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.46 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
IJR vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJR drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJR and HYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJR | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.15% | -34.25% | -23.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -2.34% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.02% | -4.56% | -23.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | -15.79% | -12.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.36% | -22.03% | -22.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.00% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -3.24% | -6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 0.53% | +2.07% |
Volatility
IJR vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.22%. This indicates that IJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJR | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 1.22% | +3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.63% | 3.00% | +8.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.51% | 3.79% | +13.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.40% | 7.52% | +13.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 8.29% | +14.62% |
IJR vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJR vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison
IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than HYG's 5.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.90% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.14% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJR and HYG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJR has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to HYG (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJR dropped -58.15% vs HYG's -34.25%.
On 10-year performance, IJR leads with 10.76% vs 4.97% for HYG. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJR has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 4.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 1.14% for IJR.
IJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while HYG tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IJR and 0.49% for HYG.
IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJR and HYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer